Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000026415 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000030347 |
Scientific Title | Intranasal Ketamine versus intramuscular Pethidine in labor pain analgesia. |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2017/03/07 |
Last modified on | 2017/03/06 13:33:47 |
Intranasal Ketamine versus intramuscular Pethidine in labor pain analgesia.
Intranasal Ketamine versus intramuscular Pethidine in labor pain analgesia.
Intranasal Ketamine versus intramuscular Pethidine in labor pain analgesia.
Intranasal Ketamine versus intramuscular Pethidine in labor pain analgesia.
Africa |
This study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tanta University on patients attending the labor unit.
Obstetrics and Gynecology | Anesthesiology |
Others
NO
to compare Ketamine when given in sub-anesthetic intra-nasal dose with intramuscular pethedine as labor analgesic
Safety,Efficacy
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
APGAR score at 1 and 5 minutes of neonate, pH of the cord blood, duration of labor, mode of labor, the need for rescue analgesia, the occurrence of complications like hallucination and vomiting and the overall patient satisfaction
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Cluster
Open -no one is blinded
Active
2
Treatment
Medicine |
In group A (study group 1) (53 patients) the patients received an initial dose of 0.5 mg/kg intranasal ketamine; this dose was based on previous studies regarding postoperative pain.(12) The patients then received a single repeat dose of 0.25 mg/kg intranasal ketamine after 1 hour after the initial drug administration
while in group B (study group 2) (52 patients) the patients received a standard 50 mg intramuscular pethidine injection. The patients then received a single repeat dose of 50 mg intramuscular pethidine injection 1 hour after the initial drug administration.
18 | years-old | <= |
38 | years-old | >= |
Female
The study inclusion criteria were: Age from 18 to 38 years, with confirmed active first stage of labor with at least 2 cm cervical dilatation and at least 80% cervical effacement.
The exclusion criteria were patients with any indication for caesarean section, patients with diabetes mellitus, hypertension, abnormal liver function tests, known cardiac or renal disease, endocrinological diseases, chronic diseases, multifetal pregnancy and also patients with history of two years infertility or more.
50
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | ahmed elsayed elhalwagy |
Tanta university, faculty of medicine
Egypt
obstetrics &gynecology
8 amro ebn elass street
00201202224924
halwagy22@yahoo.com
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | ahmed elsayed elhalwagy |
Tanta university, faculty of medicine Egypt
obstetrics &gynecology
8 amro ebn elass street
00201202224924
halwagy22@yahoo.com
Tanta university
Tanta university
Outside Japan
NO
2017 | Year | 03 | Month | 07 | Day |
Unpublished
Completed
2016 | Year | 01 | Month | 01 | Day |
2016 | Year | 06 | Month | 01 | Day |
2017 | Year | 03 | Month | 06 | Day |
2017 | Year | 03 | Month | 06 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000030347