Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000026269 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000030168 |
Scientific Title | An exploratory analysis for identifying factors associated with the primary care physicians' interpretation of the rigor of overstated abstract conclusions |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2017/02/23 |
Last modified on | 2018/03/09 15:41:01 |
An exploratory analysis for identifying factors associated with the primary care physicians' interpretation of the rigor of overstated abstract conclusions
An exploratory analysis for identifying factors associated with the primary care physicians' interpretation of the rigor of overstated abstract conclusions
An exploratory analysis for identifying factors associated with the primary care physicians' interpretation of the rigor of overstated abstract conclusions
An exploratory analysis for identifying factors associated with the primary care physicians' interpretation of the rigor of overstated abstract conclusions
Japan |
The original eligible criteria were volunteers among medical doctors of Japan Primary Care Association; clinical experience of 2 years or more; currently in clinical practice; having chance to get information on new clinical research/trials.
Adult |
Others
NO
To explore factors associated with the primary care physicians' interpretation of the rigor of overstated abstract conclusions
Others
exposures and outcomes
Exploratory
Explanatory
Not applicable
Our primary outcome was rating the overstate abstract conclusion as "rigor". The definition of the primary outcome is based on rating 5 or more against the question "How likely do you think this conclusion is rigor (0-10)?"
We will conduct the following secondary analysis to confirm if the factors associated with rigor rating in the primary analysis are dependent on the existence of overstatement.
We will add the factors to interaction terms in the model and check the interaction between the factors and overstatement, using the full analysis set of the DOCTOR study
Observational
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Male and Female
1. Volunteers among medical doctors of Japan Primary Care Association
2. Medical doctor
3. Clinical experience of 2 years or more
4. Currently in clinical practice
5. Having chance to get information on new clinical research/trials. In the present study
Mainly working at an educational or a research institution
286
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Yasushi Tsujimoto |
Kyoto University
Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, School of Public Health in the Graduate School of Medicine
Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto
09015982834
yssh0108@yahoo.co.jp
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Yasushi Tsujimoto |
Kyoto University
Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, School of Public Health in the Graduate School of Medicine
Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto
09015982834
yssh0108@yahoo.co.jp
Kyoto University
None
Other
NO
2017 | Year | 02 | Month | 23 | Day |
Unpublished
Completed
2017 | Year | 02 | Month | 22 | Day |
2017 | Year | 02 | Month | 23 | Day |
The following factors are suspected to associate with rigor rating
1. Sex
2. Postgraduate year (3-5, 6-20. 21-)
3. Main workplace (clinic or hospital)
4. Board certification
5. PhD
6. The way to get information on new clinical research/trials (self-searching for articles or other)
7. Number of abstracts read for the last month
8. EBM (Evidence Based Medicine) seminar or workshop attendance
9. An experience to conduct clinical research as a primary investigator
2017 | Year | 02 | Month | 23 | Day |
2018 | Year | 03 | Month | 09 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000030168