| Recruitment status | Completed |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000026220 |
| Receipt No. | R000029996 |
| Official scientific title of the study | Evaluation of efficiency of mesenteric approach during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2017/02/20 |
| Last modified on | 2017/08/22 (Ver. 2) |
| Basic information | ||
| Official scientific title of the study | Evaluation of efficiency of mesenteric approach during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer | |
| Title of the study (Brief title) | Evaluation of efficiency of mesenteric approach during pancreaticoduodenectomy | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | ||
| Condition | Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma | |
| Classification by specialty |
|
|
| Classification by malignancy | Malignancy | |
| Genomic information | NO | |
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | to evaluate of clinical benefits of mesenteric approach during pancreaticoduodenectomy |
| Basic objectives2 | Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | |
| Trial characteristics_2 | |
| Developmental phase | |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | Blood loss volume, R0 rate |
| Key secondary outcomes | operative time, recurrence rate, overall survival, disease free survival |
| Base | |
| Study type | Observational |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | |
| Randomization | |
| Randomization unit | |
| Blinding | |
| Control | |
| Stratification | |
| Dynamic allocation | |
| Institution consideration | |
| Blocking | |
| Concealment | |
| Intervention | |
| No. of arms | |
| Purpose of intervention | |
| Type of intervention | |
| Interventions/Control_1 | |
| Interventions/Control_2 | |
| Interventions/Control_3 | |
| Interventions/Control_4 | |
| Interventions/Control_5 | |
| Interventions/Control_6 | |
| Interventions/Control_7 | |
| Interventions/Control_8 | |
| Interventions/Control_9 | |
| Interventions/Control_10 | |
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | pancreatic cancer patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy | |||
| Key exclusion criteria | patients without pathological diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma | |||
| Target sample size | 237 | |||
| Research contact person | |
| Name of lead principal investigator | Seiko Hirono |
| Organization | Wakayama Medical University |
| Division name | Second Department of Surgery |
| Address | 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, Japan |
| TEL | 073-441-0613 |
| seiko-h@wakayama-med.ac.jp | |
| Public contact | |
| Name of contact person | Seiko Hirono |
| Organization | Wakayama Medical University |
| Division name | Second Department of Surgery |
| Address | 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, Japan |
| TEL | 073-441-0613 |
| Homepage URL | |
| seiko-h@wakayama-med.ac.jp | |
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Self funding |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Completed | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date | |||||||
| Date of closure to data entry | |||||||
| Date trial data considered complete | |||||||
| Date analysis concluded | |||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | |
| Publication of results | Published |
| URL releasing results | |
| Results | Mesenteric approach could reduce intraoperative blood loss volume in both resectable and borderline resectable (BR) PDAC during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). In resectable PDAC, mesenteric approach could increase R0 rate and improve the overall survival (OS), however, in BR PDAC, could not do them. Therefore, resectable PDAC has oncological benefits of mesenteric approach, however, only surgical method might not give the oncological benefit fo BR PDAC might. |
| Other related information | Retrospective observable study
Evalustion for the efficiency of mesenteric approach for pancreatic cancer |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/icdr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000029996 |