| Recruitment status | Open public recruiting |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000025619 |
| Receipt No. | R000029187 |
| Scientific Title | Effect of stabilizing of walking on brain activity as shown by FDG-PET |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2017/01/18 |
| Last modified on | 2020/07/22 (Ver. 12) |
| Basic information | ||
| Public title | Effect of stabilizing of walking on brain activity as shown by FDG-PET | |
| Acronym | Effect of stabilizing of walking on brain activity as shown by FDG-PET | |
| Scientific Title | Effect of stabilizing of walking on brain activity as shown by FDG-PET | |
| Scientific Title:Acronym | Effect of stabilizing of walking on brain activity as shown by FDG-PET | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | ||
| Condition | Healthy elderly people | |
| Classification by specialty |
|
|
| Classification by malignancy | Others | |
| Genomic information | NO | |
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | Target healthy elderly people with gait instability. It is clarified by gait analysis using an acceleration sensor that the gait becomes stable by adjusting the insole and shoe sole thickness. When the gait stabilizes, the fluctuation of the head is also reduced, and it is confirmed by FDG-PET that muscle activity and brain activity are the same as those of gait stable. From this, we aim to find out the way of walking intervention in dementia prevention. |
| Basic objectives2 | Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | Exploratory |
| Trial characteristics_2 | Others |
| Developmental phase | Not applicable |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | It is confirmed that walking speed, walking strength, walking stability improve by adjusting the insole wear and thickness of the shoe sole. Image analysis is performed by FDG-PET for brain activity and whole body muscle activity when performing a walking task for 30 minutes. We perform FDG - PET shooting at a time interval of about 1 month, twice in total, walking done in an unstable state and stable walking, and compare and examine. |
| Key secondary outcomes | |
| Base | |
| Study type | Interventional |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | Single arm |
| Randomization | Non-randomized |
| Randomization unit | |
| Blinding | Open -no one is blinded |
| Control | Self control |
| Stratification | |
| Dynamic allocation | |
| Institution consideration | |
| Blocking | |
| Concealment | |
| Intervention | |||
| No. of arms | 1 | ||
| Purpose of intervention | Prevention | ||
| Type of intervention |
|
||
| Interventions/Control_1 | We choose a group of 6 subjects judged as gait instability by the foot arch measurements of X-ray photography with the imaging radiation dose of 0.05 msv per shoot and by walking analysis by acceleration sensor. Their sugar metabolism of muscles and brains are measured by FDG-PET after 30 minutes' walk with the emphasis on instabilities of foot and legs. Subjects wear the acceleration sensor during the walk in order to conduct their gait analysis simultaneously. One month later, we measured again by FDG-PET after 30 minute's stabilized walk with the intervention of wearing insoles and adjusting thickness of the soles, Gait analysis by the acceleration sensor is conduced again as same as before. Comparative analysis is planed on the activation amounts of muscle and brain in unstable and stable gait. | ||
| Interventions/Control_2 | |||
| Interventions/Control_3 | |||
| Interventions/Control_4 | |||
| Interventions/Control_5 | |||
| Interventions/Control_6 | |||
| Interventions/Control_7 | |||
| Interventions/Control_8 | |||
| Interventions/Control_9 | |||
| Interventions/Control_10 | |||
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | Senior citizens living in the local area without central diseases, notable internal disorders or orthopedic disease. However, person with flat feet, mild X-legs and O-legs are not excluded. | |||
| Key exclusion criteria | 1) Un stable symptoms with complaints of pain by orthopedic disease.
2) Those with a leg length difference of 3 cm or more. 3) Other subjects judged as inappropriate by the attending physician. 4) Those showing remarkable fatigue during walking. 5) Appealing dizziness with insole use or correction of the leg length difference. 6) Subjects with metal in the body such as pacemakers. |
|||
| Target sample size | 50 | |||
| Research contact person | |||||||
| Name of lead principal investigator |
|
||||||
| Organization | Tohoku University CYRIC | ||||||
| Division name | Division of Geriatric Behavioral Neurology | ||||||
| Zip code | 980-857 | ||||||
| Address | 4-1 Seiryo-mach, Aoba-ku, 980-8575 Sendaii, Japan Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer | ||||||
| TEL | 022-717-7359 | ||||||
| k-meg@umin.ac.jp | |||||||
| Public contact | |||||||
| Name of contact person |
|
||||||
| Organization | Tohoku University CYRIC | ||||||
| Division name | Division of Geriatric Behavioral Neurology | ||||||
| Zip code | 980-857 | ||||||
| Address | 4-1 Seiryo-mach, Aoba-ku, 980-8575 Sendaii, Japan Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer | ||||||
| TEL | 022-717-7359 | ||||||
| Homepage URL | |||||||
| konomitakahashi@med.tohoku.ac.jp | |||||||
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Tohoku University CYRIC Division of Geriatric Behavioral Neurology |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | Tohoku University CYRIC Division of Geriatric Behavioral Neurology |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Other |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| IRB Contact (For public release) | |
| Organization | Tohoku University |
| Address | 1-1 Seiryo-mach, Aoba-ku, 980-8575 Sendaii, Japan |
| Tel | 022-728-4105 |
| rinri-2@proj.med.tohoku.ac.jp | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | |
| Publication of results | Unpublished |
| Result | |
| URL related to results and publications | |
| Number of participants that the trial has enrolled | |
| Results | |
| Results date posted | |
| Results Delayed | |
| Results Delay Reason | |
| Date of the first journal publication of results | |
| Baseline Characteristics | |
| Participant flow | |
| Adverse events | |
| Outcome measures | |
| Plan to share IPD | |
| IPD sharing Plan description | |
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Open public recruiting | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Date of IRB |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry | |||||||
| Date trial data considered complete | |||||||
| Date analysis concluded | |||||||
| Other | |
| Other related information | |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/icdr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000029187 |