Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000024003 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000027634 |
Scientific Title | Basic versus Advanced life support for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2016/09/11 |
Last modified on | 2016/09/11 15:45:32 |
Basic versus Advanced life support for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis
BLS vs ACLS
Basic versus Advanced life support for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis
BLS vs ACLS
Japan | North America |
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Emergency medicine | Intensive care medicine |
Others
NO
This study aimed to address the question of which is superior, basic or advanced life support for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Efficacy
Neurologically favorable survival
Overall survival
Others,meta-analysis etc
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Male and Female
RCTs and observational studies comparing BLS with ALS in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest are included in this study.
Studies which don't report our primary or secondary outcomes are excluded. In addition, we exclude studies reported in languages other than English.
10000
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Tatsuma Fukuda |
The University of Tokyo
Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine
7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, JAPAN
+81-3-3815-5411
tatsumafukuda-jpn@umin.ac.jp
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Tatsuma Fukuda |
The University of Tokyo
Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine
7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, JAPAN
+81-3-3815-5411
tatsumafukuda-jpn@umin.ac.jp
The University of Tokyo
Self funding
Self funding
NO
2016 | Year | 09 | Month | 11 | Day |
Unpublished
Preinitiation
2016 | Year | 04 | Month | 01 | Day |
2016 | Year | 09 | Month | 11 | Day |
We search PubMed(MEDLINE), Cochrane library, EMBASE. At least two independent reviewers screen the abstracts and titles of the studies and subsequently reviewed the full text articles for inclusion. At least two independent reviewers also assess the risk of bias in individual studies as methodological quality of articles, and disagreements were resolved by discussion and consensus.
2016 | Year | 09 | Month | 11 | Day |
2016 | Year | 09 | Month | 11 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000027634