| Recruitment status | Completed |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000023941 |
| Receipt No. | R000027548 |
| Official scientific title of the study | Outcomes of Treatment Strategies for Isolated Spontaneous Superior Mesenteric Artery Dissection: A Systematic Review |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2016/09/10 |
| Last modified on | 2017/08/06 (Ver. 2) |
| Basic information | ||
| Official scientific title of the study | Outcomes of Treatment Strategies for Isolated Spontaneous Superior Mesenteric Artery Dissection: A Systematic Review | |
| Title of the study (Brief title) | A Systematic Review of Isolated SMA dissection | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | |||
| Condition | Isolated spontaneous superior mesenteric artery dissection | ||
| Classification by specialty |
|
||
| Classification by malignancy | Others | ||
| Genomic information | NO | ||
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics and the treatment strategies of isolated spontaneous superior mesenteric artery dissection. |
| Basic objectives2 | Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | |
| Trial characteristics_2 | |
| Developmental phase | Not applicable |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | a composite of SMA dissection-related death and the use of an additional intervention (endovascular or surgery) |
| Key secondary outcomes | |
| Base | |
| Study type | Others,meta-analysis etc |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | |
| Randomization | |
| Randomization unit | |
| Blinding | |
| Control | |
| Stratification | |
| Dynamic allocation | |
| Institution consideration | |
| Blocking | |
| Concealment | |
| Intervention | |
| No. of arms | |
| Purpose of intervention | |
| Type of intervention | |
| Interventions/Control_1 | |
| Interventions/Control_2 | |
| Interventions/Control_3 | |
| Interventions/Control_4 | |
| Interventions/Control_5 | |
| Interventions/Control_6 | |
| Interventions/Control_7 | |
| Interventions/Control_8 | |
| Interventions/Control_9 | |
| Interventions/Control_10 | |
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Clinical Trial.gov databases until December 31, 2015. We retrieved articles presenting the treatment and outcomes of isolated SMA dissection. | |||
| Key exclusion criteria | Articles reporting SMA dissections that were iatrogenic or traumatic, or were associated with abdominal aortic dissection were excluded. Additionally, we excluded single-patient case reports, systematic reviews, and reports on other visceral artery dissections. | |||
| Target sample size | 500 | |||
| Research contact person | |
| Name of lead principal investigator | Takao Kato |
| Organization | Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine |
| Division name | Department of Cardiovascular Medicine |
| Address | 54 Kawaharacho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan |
| TEL | +81-75-751-3190 |
| takao-kato@kitano-hp.or.jp | |
| Public contact | |
| Name of contact person | Yuki Kimura |
| Organization | Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital |
| Division name | Cardiovascular Center |
| Address | 2-4-20 Ogimachi, Kita-ku, Osaka 530-8480, Japan |
| TEL | +81-6-6361-0588 |
| Homepage URL | |
| yuuki-kitano@kitano-hp.or.jp | |
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Cardiovascular Center, Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | Cardiovascular Center, Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Self funding |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Completed | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date | |||||||
| Date of closure to data entry | |||||||
| Date trial data considered complete | |||||||
| Date analysis concluded | |||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | |
| Publication of results | Published |
| URL releasing results | http://www.annalsofvascularsurgery.com/article/S0890-5096(17)30917-2/fulltext |
| Results | OBJECTIVES:
Isolated spontaneous dissection of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) without aortic dissection is being increasingly recognized. This study aimed to evaluate the latest clinical characteristics and optimal treatment. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Clinical Trial.gov databases through December 31, 2016, using the following words: "superior mesenteric artery" and "dissection." We retrieved articles presenting the treatment and outcomes of isolated SMA dissection published in English. We investigated the patient characteristics, treatments, follow-up, and prognoses. Additionally, we compared mortality rates and assessed the need for additional interventions between treatment strategies in symptomatic patients without accompanying proof of bowel ischaemia or aneurysm, which require immediate endovascular treatment or surgery. RESULTS: We identified 51 articles with 721 patients. The initial treatments in symptomatic patients without accompanying proof of bowel ischaemia or aneurysm were conservative treatment (82.1%), endovascular treatment (14.3%), catheter-directed infusion of medication (2.1%), and surgery (1.5%). Additional treatment was needed in 18.1% of patients receiving conservative treatment and 2.4% of patients receiving endovascular treatment (P = 0.0003). Mortality was not significantly different between each treatment strategy (P = 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in mortality of symptomatic SMA dissection patients without accompanying proof of bowel ischaemia or aneurysm between interventional treatment and conservative treatment. An additional treatment is needed in a minority of patients receiving conservative treatment, however, more frequently than in those receiving endovascular treatment. |
| Other related information | Systematic review and meta-analysis of isolated spontaneous dissection of the superior mesenteric artery. |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000027548 |