| Recruitment status | Completed |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000023190 |
| Receipt No. | R000026734 |
| Official scientific title of the study | Development of a risk scale for emergence agitation after general anesthesia in children |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2016/07/15 |
| Last modified on | 2016/07/15 (Ver. 2) |
| Basic information | ||
| Official scientific title of the study | Development of a risk scale for emergence agitation after general anesthesia in children | |
| Title of the study (Brief title) | Development of a risk scale for emergence agitation after general anesthesia in children | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | |||
| Condition | inguinal hernia, adenoid hypertrophy, tonsillar hypertrophy, unilateral strabismus, cryptorchidism, otitis media, and other minor surgeries | ||
| Classification by specialty |
|
||
| Classification by malignancy | Others | ||
| Genomic information | NO | ||
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | The goal of this two-phased study was 1) to determine predictors of EA after general anesthesia in children and develop an EA risk scale using the predictors with their logarithm of odds ratio in retrospective study (development phase), and 2) to confirm validity of the EA risk scale in the prospective cohort study (validation phase). |
| Basic objectives2 | Others |
| Basic objectives -Others | The goal of this two-phased study was 1) to determine predictors of EA after general anesthesia in children and develop an EA risk scale using the predictors with their logarithm of odds ratio in retrospective study (development phase), and 2) to confirm validity of the EA risk scale in the prospective cohort study (validation phase). |
| Trial characteristics_1 | Exploratory |
| Trial characteristics_2 | Pragmatic |
| Developmental phase | Not applicable |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | Development of the EA risk scale and confirmation its validity. |
| Key secondary outcomes | |
| In outcomes field, the entry of just a few words such as "safety" or "efficiency" will not be accepted. Specify the name of outcome measures, including the time when you plan to measure. Usually, only one primary outcome is accepted. Write the other outcomes in "secondary outcomes" field. |
| Base | |
| Study type | Observational |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | |
| Randomization | |
| Randomization unit | |
| Blinding | |
| Control | |
| Stratification | |
| Dynamic allocation | |
| Institution consideration | |
| Blocking | |
| Concealment | |
| Intervention | |
| No. of arms | |
| Purpose of intervention | |
| Type of intervention | |
| Interventions/Control_1 | |
| Interventions/Control_2 | |
| Interventions/Control_3 | |
| Interventions/Control_4 | |
| Interventions/Control_5 | |
| Interventions/Control_6 | |
| Interventions/Control_7 | |
| Interventions/Control_8 | |
| Interventions/Control_9 | |
| Interventions/Control_10 | |
| In interventions field, include the details of interventions, such as duration, amount, and frequency. If the intervention includes prescription or use of medical devices, duration is required. |
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | We enrolled patients with ASA physical status I or II aged from 1.5 to 8 years who were scheduled to undergo general anesthesia. Operative procedures included inguinal hernia repair, adenoidectomy and/or tonsillectomy, unilateral strabismus surgery, cryptorchidism repair, tympanostomy tube insertion, and other minor surgeries. | |||
| Key exclusion criteria | We excluded patients who took psychotropic drugs or has mental retardation. | |||
| Target sample size | 100 | |||
| Research contact person | |
| Name of lead principal investigator | Maai Hino |
| Organization | Itabashi Chuo Medical Center |
| Division name | Department of Anesthesiology |
| Address | Azusawa 2-12-7, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan |
| TEL | 03-3967-1181 |
| mhino0@yahoo.co.jp | |
| Public contact | |
| Name of contact person | Takahiro Mihara |
| Organization | Kanagawa Children's Medical Center |
| Division name | Department of Anesthesiology |
| Address | Mutsukawa 2-138-4, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Japan |
| TEL | 045-711-2351 |
| Homepage URL | |
| miharaxxxtotoro@yahoo.co.jp | |
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Kanagawa Children's Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
Department of Anesthesiology |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Sponsor means an organization that is responsible for plan, deployment and report of the research including funding management. It doesn't mean funding agency". Therefore, all clinical trial should have the one. |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | None |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Self funding |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | 神奈川県立こども医療センター(神奈川県) |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Completed | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry |
|
||||||
| Date trial data considered complete |
|
||||||
| Date analysis concluded |
|
||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | |
| Publication of results | Unpublished |
| URL releasing results | |
| Results | We developed the EA risk scale by using the data from the previous RCT in our hospital. The EA risk scale consisted of four domains; age, PAB score, operative procedure, and anesthesia time. In addition, the EA risk scale showed an excellent predictive performance (c-index > 0.8) in our validation cohort. |
| Other related information | The EA risk score ranged from 1 to 23 points. The area under the ROC curve (i.e., the c-index) of the validation phase was 0.81 (95 % CI: 0.72-0.89). The best cut-off point was 11 (sensitivity = 87 %, and specificity = 61 %). The gray zone of the validation phase ranged from 10 to 13 points in which 38 % of all patients were included |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000026734 |