Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000023173 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000026709 |
Scientific Title | Comparison of AutoFlow and conventional volume-controlled ventilation using LMA ProSeal during gynecological laparoscopic surgery |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2016/07/14 |
Last modified on | 2021/07/17 09:45:54 |
Comparison of AutoFlow and conventional volume-controlled ventilation using LMA ProSeal during gynecological laparoscopic surgery
Evaluation of AutoFlow ventilation mode using LMA ProSeal during gynecological laparoscopy
Comparison of AutoFlow and conventional volume-controlled ventilation using LMA ProSeal during gynecological laparoscopic surgery
Evaluation of AutoFlow ventilation mode using LMA ProSeal during gynecological laparoscopy
Japan |
Patients undergo gynecological laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia
Anesthesiology |
Malignancy
NO
To evaluate the application of AutoFlow volume-controlled ventilation mode for gynecological laparoscopic surgery using LMA Proseal
Efficacy
Peak airway pressure during pneumoperitoneum and trendelenburg position
Leak from LMA ProSeal during pneumoperitoneum and trendelenburg position
Peak airway pressure before pneumoperitoneum
Peak airway pressure shortly after initiation of pneumoperitoneum
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Single blind -participants are blinded
Placebo
NO
NO
Institution is not considered as adjustment factor.
YES
Numbered container method
2
Treatment
Maneuver |
Conventional volume-controlled ventilation
Volume-controlled ventilation using AutoFlow mode
20 | years-old | <= |
80 | years-old | >= |
Female
Patients undergo gynecological laparoscopic surgery
Patients considered inadequate for intraoperative airway management using LMA ProSeal
80
1st name | Toshiyuki |
Middle name | |
Last name | Nakanishi |
JCHO Tokuyama Central Hospital
Department of Anesthesiology
745-8522
1-1 Kohdacho, Shunan city
0834-28-4411
nakanishi.anest@gmail.com
1st name | Toshiyuki |
Middle name | |
Last name | Nakanishi |
JCHO Tokuyama Central Hospital
Department of Anesthesiology
745-8522
1-1 Kohdacho, Shunan city
0834-28-4411
nakanishi.anest@gmail.com
JCHO Tokuyama Central Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology
JCHO Tokuyama Central Hospital
Self funding
JCHO Tokuyama Central Hospital IRB
1-1 Kohdacho, Shunan city, Yamaguchi, Japan
0834-28-4411
chiken2@tokuchuhp.jp
NO
2016 | Year | 07 | Month | 14 | Day |
https://bmcanesthesiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12871-021-01406-6
Published
https://bmcanesthesiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12871-021-01406-6
80
Data from 40 patients in the AutoFlow group and 39 in the VCV group were used for analysis. PAWP at pneumoperitoneum pressure and in the Trendelenburg position was significantly lower in the AutoFlow group than in the VCV group [median (interquartile range), 16 (15-18) cmH2O vs. 18 (17-19) cmH2O; P < 0.001]. Airway leak occurred in four patients in the AutoFlow group and in two patients in the VCV group; however, this incidence was not significantly different (P = 0.68).
2021 | Year | 07 | Month | 17 | Day |
2021 | Year | 06 | Month | 28 | Day |
We screened and recruited 80 adult women undergoing elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery, aged 20-80 years, and with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 or 2.
Patients who were thought to be unsuitable for management with pLMA, such as those with morbid obesity (body mass index > 35 kg/m2), who have not fasted, or with gastroesophageal reflux disease, were excluded from the study.
None.
The primary outcome was PAWP during pneumoperitoneum and in the Trendelenburg position, whereas the secondary outcomes included PAWP at other timepoints and airway leak development.
Completed
2016 | Year | 05 | Month | 17 | Day |
2016 | Year | 05 | Month | 11 | Day |
2016 | Year | 07 | Month | 14 | Day |
2017 | Year | 08 | Month | 16 | Day |
2016 | Year | 07 | Month | 14 | Day |
2021 | Year | 07 | Month | 17 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000026709