Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000024824 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000026530 |
Scientific Title | The accuracy of the non-invasive continuous arterial pressure monitoring that is adjusted with perfusion index: A method comparison study. |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2017/03/31 |
Last modified on | 2019/10/30 23:51:43 |
The accuracy of the non-invasive continuous arterial pressure monitoring that is adjusted with perfusion index: A method comparison study.
Non-invasive continuous arterial pressure monitoring and perfusion index
The accuracy of the non-invasive continuous arterial pressure monitoring that is adjusted with perfusion index: A method comparison study.
Non-invasive continuous arterial pressure monitoring and perfusion index
Japan |
Patients who are undergoing to the planed hepatectomy or pancreaticoduodenectomy with general anesthesia
Anesthesiology | Adult |
Malignancy
NO
The aim of our study is to evaluate whether perfusion index can indicate the low accuracy range of the non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring.
Efficacy
The standard deviation of the bias between arterial pressures obtained by ClearSight versus by an arterial catheter.
The bias and 95% limits of agreement of arterial blood pressure between two devices (Bland-Altman method for repeated measurements)
(1) The beta coefficient of the bias using the linear mixed-effects model between arterial pressures obtained with ClearSight versus with an arterial catheter
(2) The percentage error of the arterial pressure
(3) Interclass correlation coefficients of the arterial pressure
(4) The beta coefficient of the CO, SV, SVV calculated by the mixed linier regression model.
Observational
20 | years-old | <= |
Not applicable |
Male and Female
Patients who are undergoing to elective hepatectomy or pancreaticoduodenectomy by general anesthesia.
(1)body weight < 40 or >180 kg, BMI > 35kg/m2
(2)History of Raynaud syndrome and related diseases
(3)Hystory of atrial fibrillation
(4)History of the brachial vascular surgery
30
1st name | Masashi |
Middle name | |
Last name | Yokose |
Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine
2360004
3-9, Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Japan
+81457872800
yokose_p12@yahoo.co.jp
1st name | Masashi |
Middle name | |
Last name | Yokose |
Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine
2360004
3-9, Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Japan
+81457872800
yokose_p12@yahoo.co.jp
Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine
Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine
Self funding
Institutional ethics committee of the Yokohama City University Hospital
3-9, Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Japan
+81453707627
rinri@yokohama-cu.ac.jp
NO
2017 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0219511
Published
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0219511
30
Compared with the case of PI>1, the adjusted SD of bias in the case of PI<=1 was 1.4 times (95% confidence interval; 1.3 to 1.4) in systolic arterial pressure, 1.5 times (95% confidence interval 1.3 to 1.6) in diastolic arterial pressure, and 1.3 times (95% confidence interval 1.2-1.5) in mean arterial pressure.
2019 | Year | 10 | Month | 30 | Day |
2019 | Year | 07 | Month | 10 | Day |
6448 data points were obtained from 30 parturients.
The number of the excluded individual was 0.
136 data points were excluded because of the artefact and missing data.
None
The ratio of the adjusted SD of bias between PI<=1 and PI>1.
Completed
2016 | Year | 10 | Month | 19 | Day |
2016 | Year | 10 | Month | 19 | Day |
2016 | Year | 11 | Month | 15 | Day |
2017 | Year | 10 | Month | 06 | Day |
An invasive arterial catheter (FloTrac sensor)is inserted to the left radial artery after induction of the gengeral anesthesia. ClearSight finger cuff and probe of the pulse oximeter are also attached to the left hand finger.
Data collection: arterial blood pressure, cardiac output, stroke volume, stroke volume variation, perfusion index, and body temperature.
Data collection period:
One measurement period: 15 minutes
one data point: averages of 1 minute blood pressure data
-Operating room
The measuring period will be set at least 8 times during operation.
We plan to collect more than 120 points (i.e. 8*15=120 points) per one patient.
-Intensive care unit
Performing at least 2 data collection periods from 1 hour to 4 hours after entering the intensive care unit.(i.e. 2*15=30 points per one patient)
Anesthetic or post operative management were at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist.
Data collection period: 24 hours later from data collection start at the operative room or 4 hours later from admission on ICU
2016 | Year | 11 | Month | 14 | Day |
2019 | Year | 10 | Month | 30 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000026530