UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Recruitment status Completed
Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000023340
Receipt No. R000026399
Scientific Title Effects of Paravertebral versus Thoracic Wall Block on the Quality of Recovery after Breast Cancer Surgery.
Date of disclosure of the study information 2016/07/28
Last modified on 2019/07/01 (Ver. 4)

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information
Public title Effects of Paravertebral versus Thoracic Wall Block on the Quality of Recovery after Breast Cancer Surgery.
Acronym Effects of Paravertebral versus Thoracic Wall Block on the Quality of Recovery after Breast Cancer Surgery.
Scientific Title Effects of Paravertebral versus Thoracic Wall Block on the Quality of Recovery after Breast Cancer Surgery.
Scientific Title:Acronym Effects of Paravertebral versus Thoracic Wall Block on the Quality of Recovery after Breast Cancer Surgery.
Region
Japan

Condition
Condition Patients undergoing breast cancer surgery
Classification by specialty
Breast surgery Anesthesiology
Classification by malignancy Malignancy
Genomic information NO

Objectives
Narrative objectives1 Chronic pain after breast cancer surgery has harmful effects on patients' daily life. Paravertebral block can prevent not only acute but chronic pain after breast cancer surgery, although the block is not easily put into practice because of technical difficulty or necessity to change patients' position. Recently, thoracic wall blocks have been reported by Blanco and in hope that it gives similar analgesic efficacy as paravertebral block with less risks, however there are no reports comparing analgesic efficacy of paravertebral block with thoracic wall blocks. Although there are several scales evaluating postoperative pain including VAS or NRS, Quality of Recovery (QoR) have been set up to assess the impact of postoperative morbidity on patients' ability to return to normal function and quality of life. Among those assessment scales, QoR-40 has been mainly applied. It consists of 40 questions including five dimensions: psychologic support, physical comfort, emotional state, physical independence, and pain, and there is a report suggesting that paravertebral block improve QoR-40 after ambulatory breast tumor resection. In this randomized, noninferiority trial, we hypothesized that thoracic wall blocks provides preserving effect of QoR-40 at least as good as paravertebral block after breast cancer surgery.
Basic objectives2 Efficacy
Basic objectives -Others
Trial characteristics_1 Confirmatory
Trial characteristics_2 Explanatory
Developmental phase Not applicable

Assessment
Primary outcomes QoR(Quality of Recovery)-40 on the day after surgery
Key secondary outcomes QoR-40 on the day before surgery
QoR-40 three days, 1, 3, 6, 12 months after surgery
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain one hour after surgery, on the day after surgery
VAS for pain three days, 1, 3, 6, 12 months after surgery
Patients' age, height, body weight, sex
total dose of fentanyl and remifentanil
frequency of analgesics' usage
frequency of postoperative nausea and vomiting
time from applying blocks to first analgesics' usage
complications (e.g. vascular pancture, pneumothorax, hematoma, neuronal injury)
frequency of recurrence

Base
Study type Interventional

Study design
Basic design Parallel
Randomization Randomized
Randomization unit Individual
Blinding Double blind -all involved are blinded
Control Active
Stratification NO
Dynamic allocation NO
Institution consideration Institution is not considered as adjustment factor.
Blocking YES
Concealment Numbered container method

Intervention
No. of arms 2
Purpose of intervention Treatment
Type of intervention
Maneuver
Interventions/Control_1 paravertebral block before breast surgery using ropivacaine 150mg.
Interventions/Control_2 thoracic wall block before breast surgery using ropivacaine 150mg.
Interventions/Control_3
Interventions/Control_4
Interventions/Control_5
Interventions/Control_6
Interventions/Control_7
Interventions/Control_8
Interventions/Control_9
Interventions/Control_10

Eligibility
Age-lower limit
20 years-old <=
Age-upper limit
70 years-old >=
Gender Female
Key inclusion criteria patients undergoing breast cancer surgery at Bellland General ospital.
Key exclusion criteria Patients who do not agree with this study, pregnant and parturient women, allergy to rocal anesthetics, significant psychiatric or mental disorders, patients with chronic pain.
Target sample size 36

Research contact person
Name of lead principal investigator
1st name Toshinori
Middle name
Last name Horiuchi
Organization Bellland General Hospital
Division name Department of Anesthesia
Zip code 599-8247
Address 500-3, Higashiyama, Naka-Ku, Sakai, Osaka
TEL 072-234-2001
Email t_horiuchi@seichokai.or.jp

Public contact
Name of contact person
1st name Toshinori
Middle name
Last name Horiuchi
Organization Bellland General Hospital
Division name Department of Anesthesia
Zip code 599-8247
Address 500-3, Higashiyama, Naka-Ku, Sakai, Osaka
TEL 072-234-2001
Homepage URL
Email t_horiuchi@seichokai.or.jp

Sponsor
Institute Department of Anesthesia, Bellland General Hospital
Institute
Department

Funding Source
Organization None
Organization
Division
Category of Funding Organization Self funding
Nationality of Funding Organization

Other related organizations
Co-sponsor
Name of secondary funder(s)

IRB Contact (For public release)
Organization Bellland General Hospital Institutional Review Board
Address 500-3, Higashiyama, Naka-Ku, Sakai, Osaka
Tel 072-234-2001
Email irb@bh.seichokai.or.jp

Secondary IDs
Secondary IDs NO
Study ID_1
Org. issuing International ID_1
Study ID_2
Org. issuing International ID_2
IND to MHLW

Institutions
Institutions ベルランド総合病院(大阪府)

Other administrative information
Date of disclosure of the study information
2016 Year 07 Month 28 Day

Related information
URL releasing protocol
Publication of results Unpublished

Result
URL related to results and publications
Number of participants that the trial has enrolled
Results
Results date posted
Results Delayed
Results Delay Reason
Date of the first journal publication of results
Baseline Characteristics
Participant flow
Adverse events
Outcome measures
Plan to share IPD
IPD sharing Plan description

Progress
Recruitment status Completed
Date of protocol fixation
2016 Year 06 Month 29 Day
Date of IRB
2016 Year 06 Month 29 Day
Anticipated trial start date
2016 Year 07 Month 28 Day
Last follow-up date
2018 Year 07 Month 28 Day
Date of closure to data entry
2018 Year 08 Month 28 Day
Date trial data considered complete
2018 Year 08 Month 28 Day
Date analysis concluded
2018 Year 09 Month 28 Day

Other
Other related information

Management information
Registered date
2016 Year 07 Month 26 Day
Last modified on
2019 Year 07 Month 01 Day


Link to view the page
URL(English) https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000026399