| Recruitment status | Completed |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000022443 |
| Receipt No. | R000025368 |
| Official scientific title of the study | Real-world fEAsibiLlity of noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve derived from coronary Computed Tomography angiography 2 |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2016/06/01 |
| Last modified on | 2017/11/28 (Ver. 4) |
| Basic information | ||
| Official scientific title of the study | Real-world fEAsibiLlity of noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve derived from coronary Computed Tomography angiography 2 | |
| Title of the study (Brief title) | REAL-FFRCT2 | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | ||
| Condition | consecutive patients who had suspected significant coronary artery disease by CCTA and undergoing invasive coronary angiography within 60 days after acquisition of CCTA | |
| Classification by specialty |
|
|
| Classification by malignancy | Others | |
| Genomic information | NO | |
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | To validate the feasibility and diagnostic performance of FFRCT in consecutive patients who had suspected significant CAD by CCTA with Nitrate spray in real clinical practice and evaluate the impact of Nitrate comparing with the diagnostic performance of FFRCT in REAL-FFRCT1 |
| Basic objectives2 | Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | |
| Trial characteristics_2 | |
| Developmental phase | |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | FFRCT value <=0.80 for suspecting hemodynamically significant CAD in FFRCT, and invasive FFR value <=0.80 as a reference standard for hemodynamically significant CAD. |
| Key secondary outcomes | Comparison of diagnostic performance of FFRCT between REAL-FFRCT1 and 2 |
| Base | |
| Study type | Observational |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | |
| Randomization | |
| Randomization unit | |
| Blinding | |
| Control | |
| Stratification | |
| Dynamic allocation | |
| Institution consideration | |
| Blocking | |
| Concealment | |
| Intervention | |
| No. of arms | |
| Purpose of intervention | |
| Type of intervention | |
| Interventions/Control_1 | |
| Interventions/Control_2 | |
| Interventions/Control_3 | |
| Interventions/Control_4 | |
| Interventions/Control_5 | |
| Interventions/Control_6 | |
| Interventions/Control_7 | |
| Interventions/Control_8 | |
| Interventions/Control_9 | |
| Interventions/Control_10 | |
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | consecutive patients who had suspected significant CAD by CCTA and undergoing invasive coronary angiography within 60 days after acquisition of CCTA | |||
| Key exclusion criteria | We excluded patients with characteristics unsuitable for CCTA, including contraindication to beta blockers, nitrates, or adenosine, advanced bradycardia, severe tachyarrhythmia, severe hypotension, severe asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congenital heart disease, previous artificial device implantation such as pacemaker or prosthetic valve, previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with coronary stents, previous coronary artery bypass grafting, serum creatinine level greater than 1.5 mg/dL with or without hemodialysis, allergy to iodine contrast, pregnant state, acute coronary syndrome requiring emergency coronary angiography, recent myocardial infarction within 30 days before CCTA or coronary angiography, life expectancy less than 2 years, and inability to adhere to the study procedures.
However, there was no exclusion criteria for the quality of CCTA images influenced by various artifacts, such as coronary motion, opacification of coronary artery lumen by calcified plaque, and misregistration. |
|||
| Target sample size | 50 | |||
| Research contact person | |
| Name of lead principal investigator | Takeshi Kimura |
| Organization | Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, |
| Division name | Department of Cardiology |
| Address | 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507 Japan |
| TEL | 075-751-4255 |
| taketaka@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp | |
| Public contact | |
| Name of contact person | Tetsuma Kawaji |
| Organization | Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, |
| Division name | Department of Cardiology |
| Address | 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507 Japan |
| TEL | 075-751-4255 |
| Homepage URL | |
| kawaji@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp | |
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Department of Cardiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | Department of Cardiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Other |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Completed | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date | |||||||
| Date of closure to data entry | |||||||
| Date trial data considered complete | |||||||
| Date analysis concluded | |||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | |
| Publication of results | Partially published |
| URL releasing results | |
| Results | |
| Other related information | The pre-defined endpoints of the current study were FFRCT value <=0.80 for suspecting hemodynamically significant CAD in FFRCT, and invasive FFR value <=0.80 as a reference standard for hemodynamically significant CAD. Per-vessel correlation between FFRCT and invasive FFR was assessed by Spearman`s correlation coefficients, and Bland-Altman analysis. Diagnostic performance of FFRCT was assessed by the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) of FFRCT (<=0.80) for detecting hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis (invasive FFR<=0.80) on per-vessel basis. In AUC analysis, we adopted FFRCT value rounded off to one decimal place. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were also evaluated. |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/icdr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000025368 |