| Recruitment status | Completed |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000021878 |
| Receipt No. | R000025225 |
| Official scientific title of the study | Development and validation of the novel recurrence risk stratification for initial non-muscle invasive bladder cancer |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2016/04/12 |
| Last modified on | 2016/04/12 (Ver. 1) |
| Basic information | ||
| Official scientific title of the study | Development and validation of the novel recurrence risk stratification for initial non-muscle invasive bladder cancer | |
| Title of the study (Brief title) | Development and validation of the novel recurrence risk stratification for initial non-muscle invasive bladder cancer | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | |||
| Condition | non-muscle invasive bladder cancer | ||
| Classification by specialty |
|
||
| Classification by malignancy | Malignancy | ||
| Genomic information | NO | ||
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | Some risk classifications to estimate the prognosis of non muscle bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients have disadvantages in clinical use. To investigate whether the EORTC(European Organazation for Research and Treatment of Cancer) risk stratification is useful to predict recurrence and progression in Japanese patients with NMIBC. In addition, we developed and validated the novel, and simple risk classification of recurrence. |
| Basic objectives2 | Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | Confirmatory |
| Trial characteristics_2 | Pragmatic |
| Developmental phase | Not applicable |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | Recurrence free survival rate |
| Key secondary outcomes | Progression disease, and death of bladder cancer |
| In outcomes field, the entry of just a few words such as "safety" or "efficiency" will not be accepted. Specify the name of outcome measures, including the time when you plan to measure. Usually, only one primary outcome is accepted. Write the other outcomes in "secondary outcomes" field. |
| Base | |
| Study type | Observational |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | |
| Randomization | |
| Randomization unit | |
| Blinding | |
| Control | |
| Stratification | |
| Dynamic allocation | |
| Institution consideration | |
| Blocking | |
| Concealment | |
| Intervention | |
| No. of arms | |
| Purpose of intervention | |
| Type of intervention | |
| Interventions/Control_1 | |
| Interventions/Control_2 | |
| Interventions/Control_3 | |
| Interventions/Control_4 | |
| Interventions/Control_5 | |
| Interventions/Control_6 | |
| Interventions/Control_7 | |
| Interventions/Control_8 | |
| Interventions/Control_9 | |
| Interventions/Control_10 | |
| In interventions field, include the details of interventions, such as duration, amount, and frequency. If the intervention includes prescription or use of medical devices, duration is required. |
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | In this multicentre retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data from patients with NMIBC who underwent initial TUR-Bt at 4 Juntendo University Hospitals and Teikyo University Hospital between 2000 and 2013 (JT cohort). To achieve adequate pathological staging, the complete resection aimed to include the muscle layer of the bladder wall. | |||
| Key exclusion criteria | Patients with any of the following were excluded from this analysis: (i) non-Urothelial carcinoma histology, (ii) follow-up periods < 3 months: (iii) history of muscle-invasive or metastatic bladder cancer; (iv) history of carcinoma of the urethra, prostate (ducts or stroma), or upper urinary tract; (v) history of local radiation therapy to the pelvis; (vi) history of every kind of chemotherapy; (vii) history of previous bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) therapy. | |||
| Target sample size | 856 | |||
| Research contact person | |
| Name of lead principal investigator | Shigeo Horie |
| Organization | Juntendo University, Graduate School of Medicine |
| Division name | Department of Urology |
| Address | 2-1-1, Bunkyo-ku Hongo,Tokyo |
| TEL | 03-3813-3111 |
| tieda@juntendo.ac.jp | |
| Public contact | |
| Name of contact person | Takeshi Ieda |
| Organization | Juntendo University, Graduate School of Medicine |
| Division name | Department of Urology |
| Address | 2-1-1, Bunkyo-ku Hongo,Tokyo |
| TEL | 03-3813-3111 |
| Homepage URL | |
| tieda@juntendo.ac.jp | |
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Juntendo University, Graduate School of Medicine |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Sponsor means an organization that is responsible for plan, deployment and report of the research including funding management. It doesn't mean funding agency". Therefore, all clinical trial should have the one. |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | Juntendo University, Graduate School of Medicine |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Other |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Completed | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date | |||||||
| Date of closure to data entry | |||||||
| Date trial data considered complete | |||||||
| Date analysis concluded | |||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | |
| Publication of results | Unpublished |
| URL releasing results | |
| Results | |
| Other related information | There are no significant differences in RFS rates and PFS rated between groups according to EORTC risk classification. We constructed a novel risk model predicting recurrence that classified patients into 3 groups using 4 independent prognostic factors to predict tumor recurrence based on Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. There was a significant difference in 3 year RFS rate among 3 groups. |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000025225 |