| Recruitment status | Completed |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000036255 |
| Receipt No. | R000024872 |
| Scientific Title | The Efficacy and Safety of Alectinib in Clinical Practice ; Comparision to Crizotinib, in A Multicenter Retrospective Study. |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2019/03/19 |
| Last modified on | 2019/03/27 (Ver. 2) |
| Basic information | ||
| Public title | The Efficacy and Safety of Alectinib in Clinical Practice ; Comparision to Crizotinib, in A Multicenter Retrospective Study. | |
| Acronym | The efficacy of alectinib in a multicenter retrospective study | |
| Scientific Title | The Efficacy and Safety of Alectinib in Clinical Practice ; Comparision to Crizotinib, in A Multicenter Retrospective Study. | |
| Scientific Title:Acronym | The efficacy of alectinib in a multicenter retrospective study | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | ||
| Condition | ALK rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer | |
| Classification by specialty |
|
|
| Classification by malignancy | Malignancy | |
| Genomic information | NO | |
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | to evaluate the efficacy and safety of alectinib in clinical settings. |
| Basic objectives2 | Safety,Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | |
| Trial characteristics_2 | |
| Developmental phase | |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | Time to treatment failure |
| Key secondary outcomes | Progression-free survival
Overall survival |
| Base | |
| Study type | Observational |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | |
| Randomization | |
| Randomization unit | |
| Blinding | |
| Control | |
| Stratification | |
| Dynamic allocation | |
| Institution consideration | |
| Blocking | |
| Concealment | |
| Intervention | |
| No. of arms | |
| Purpose of intervention | |
| Type of intervention | |
| Interventions/Control_1 | |
| Interventions/Control_2 | |
| Interventions/Control_3 | |
| Interventions/Control_4 | |
| Interventions/Control_5 | |
| Interventions/Control_6 | |
| Interventions/Control_7 | |
| Interventions/Control_8 | |
| Interventions/Control_9 | |
| Interventions/Control_10 | |
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | All patients who had ALK rearrangement positive results for sensitive immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), or reverse-transcriptase polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR), and all patients with positive results for FISH had more than 15% split signals. | |||
| Key exclusion criteria | Nothing | |||
| Target sample size | 60 | |||
| Research contact person | |||||||
| Last name of lead principal investigator |
|
||||||
| Organization | Matsusaka Municipal Hospital | ||||||
| Division name | Respiratory Centor | ||||||
| Zip code | 5150073 | ||||||
| Address | 1550, Tonomachi, Matsusaka city, Mie, Japan | ||||||
| TEL | 0598-23-1515 | ||||||
| kentarou_i_0214@yahoo.co.jp | |||||||
| Public contact | |||||||
| 1st name of contact person |
|
||||||
| Organization | Matsusaka Municipal Hospital | ||||||
| Division name | Respiratory centor | ||||||
| Zip code | 5150073 | ||||||
| Address | 1550, Tonomachi, Matsusaka city, Mie, Japan | ||||||
| TEL | 0598-23-1515 | ||||||
| Homepage URL | |||||||
| kentarou_i_0214@yahoo.co.jp | |||||||
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Respiratory Centor, Matsusaka Municipal Hospital |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | Matsusaka Municipal Hospital |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Self funding |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| IRB Contact (For public release) | |
| Organization | Matsusaka Municipal Hospital |
| Address | 1550, Tonomachi, Matsusaka city, Mie |
| Tel | 0598-23-1515 |
| mchyanag@city-hosp.matsusaka.mie.jp | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | Nothing |
| Publication of results | Published |
| Result | |||||||
| URL related to results and publications | https://www.jto.org/article/S1556-0864(16)30701-8/fulltext | ||||||
| Number of participants that the trial has enrolled | 61 | ||||||
| Results | Sixty-one patients were enrolled. Forty-six patients were treated with ALK inhibitors (31 with crizotinib, 28 with alectinib, and 13 with both ALK inhibitors). The response rate was 66.7% for the crizotinib-treated group and 80.8% for the alectinib-treated group. Among all patients, TTF and PFS were significantly prolonged in the alectinib-treated group compared with in the crizotinib-treated group. OS was significantly longer in the alectinib-treated group than in the crizotinib-treated group. |
||||||
| Results date posted |
|
||||||
| Results Delayed | |||||||
| Results Delay Reason | |||||||
| Date of the first journal publication of results | |||||||
| Baseline Characteristics | Patients who recieved ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) at six institutions from May 2012 through December 2015 were enrolled in the present study. |
||||||
| Participant flow | Enrollment retrospectively |
||||||
| Adverse events | Nothing (Retrospective study) |
||||||
| Outcome measures | Overall survival Time to treatment failure |
||||||
| Plan to share IPD | |||||||
| IPD sharing Plan description | |||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Completed | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Date of IRB |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry | |||||||
| Date trial data considered complete | |||||||
| Date analysis concluded | |||||||
| Other | |
| Other related information | We reviewed the backgrounds of all patients who were diagnosed with ALK rearranged NSCLC, and assessed the efficacy of ALK inhibitors in clinical practice, using time to treatment failure (TTF), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). We investigated the reasons for discontinuation of ALK inhibitors, patterns of progressive, and adverse events in detail. Electronic medical records were used to obtain patient-specific information. The treating physicians and radiologists in each institution assessed tumor response and toxicities. |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000024872 |