UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000019228
Receipt number R000022220
Scientific Title A Randomised Controlled Trial Investigating the Effectiveness of AI (Artificial Intelligence)-enhanced Internet Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (AI-ICBT) for Adult Depression
Date of disclosure of the study information 2015/10/04
Last modified on 2026/01/06 11:38:16

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

A Randomised Controlled Trial Investigating the Effectiveness of AI (Artificial Intelligence)-enhanced Internet Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (AI-ICBT) for Adult Depression

Acronym

A trial for the assessment of the effectiveness of AI-ICBT on Japanese adults with depression as compared to standalone ICBT (AI-ICBT study)

Scientific Title

A Randomised Controlled Trial Investigating the Effectiveness of AI (Artificial Intelligence)-enhanced Internet Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (AI-ICBT) for Adult Depression

Scientific Title:Acronym

A trial for the assessment of the effectiveness of AI-ICBT on Japanese adults with depression as compared to standalone ICBT (AI-ICBT study)

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

Depression

Classification by specialty

Psychiatry Adult

Classification by malignancy

Others

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

To assess the clinical- and cost- effectiveness of AI-ICBT on Japanese adults with depression as compared to standard ICBT without AI function or waiting list

Basic objectives2

Efficacy

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1

Exploratory

Trial characteristics_2


Developmental phase



Assessment

Primary outcomes

PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire) at baseline and follow-up (7 weeks and 3 months after intervention)

Key secondary outcomes

QIDS (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology), GAD-7 (Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale), ODSIS (Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale),OASIS (Overall Anxiety Severity And Impairment Scale), SDISS (Sheehan Disability Scale) & Medical costs


Base

Study type

Interventional


Study design

Basic design

Parallel

Randomization

Randomized

Randomization unit

Individual

Blinding

Double blind -all involved are blinded

Control

Active

Stratification

YES

Dynamic allocation

NO

Institution consideration

Institution is not considered as adjustment factor.

Blocking

YES

Concealment

Central registration


Intervention

No. of arms

3

Purpose of intervention

Treatment

Type of intervention

Device,equipment Behavior,custom

Interventions/Control_1

Weekly self-help intervention by AI-enhanced ICBT over seven weeks

Interventions/Control_2

Weekly self-help intervention by standard ICBT without AI function over seven weeks

Interventions/Control_3

Wait-list

Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit

20 years-old <=

Age-upper limit

60 years-old >=

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

-Regular access to the Internet
-A score of 5 or more on the PHQ-9
-Ability to both understand and agree
with informed consent in Japanese

Key exclusion criteria

-Receiving any other CBT
-Strong suicidal ideation
-Schizophrenia
-Dementia
-Any substance addiction (except nicotine
addiction) during the 12 months prior to
the trial

-(For patients receiving treatment by a
mental health specialist/therapist)
Unavailability of therapist's permission for the patient to participate in the trial

Target sample size

900


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name Mirai
Middle name
Last name So

Organization

Keio University School of Medicine

Division name

Department of Neuropsychiatry

Zip code

160-8582

Address

35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan

TEL

+81-(0)3-3353-1211

Email

mirai.so@keio.jp


Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name Mirai
Middle name
Last name So

Organization

Keio University School of Medicine

Division name

Department of Neuropsychiatry

Zip code

160-8582

Address

Department of Neuropsychiatry

TEL

+81-(0)3-3353-1211

Homepage URL


Email

ghh13250@gmail.com


Sponsor or person

Institute

The Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

The Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Other

Nationality of Funding Organization

Japan


Other related organizations

Co-sponsor

NIKKEI RESEARCH INC.
NEC Solution Innovators, Ltd

Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization

Hiramatsu Memorial Hospital

Address

1-20 Minami 22 Nishi 14, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

Tel

011-561-0708

Email

webmaster@hiramatu-mhp.or.jp


Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions

株式会社 日経リサーチ社
NIKKEI RESEARCH INC.


Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2015 Year 10 Month 04 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol

https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/summary/16110002.html

Publication of results

Published


Result

URL related to results and publications

https://www.jmir.org/2026/1/e76902

Number of participants that the trial has enrolled

1187

Results

In ITT, engagement analyses showed a significant group x week interaction, with AI-iCBT participants demonstrating consistently higher odds of weekly participation (odds ratio 1.23, P<.001). Exploratory analyses indicated that activation of the empathic feedback function strongly predicted adherence (odds ratio 9.99, P<.001). In EAS analyses, at followup, only AIiCBT showed a significantly lower proportion of participants with a PHQ-9 score of 10 or more compared with control (difference -0.15, P=.046).

Results date posted

2026 Year 01 Month 02 Day

Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results

2026 Year 01 Month 05 Day

Baseline Characteristics

A total of 1187 participants were eligible and randomly allocated to the AI-iCBT (n=396), iCBT (n=397), or waitlist (n=394) groups (ITT population; see Figure 4 for the CONSORT flow diagram). Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The mean age was 43.50 (SD 9.85) years, and 699 (58.8%) of 1187 participants were male. Across the 3 groups, demographic and clinical characteristics were well balanced, with no significant differences in depressive symptom severity (PHQ-9: P=.56; QIDS-J: P=.74). No significant baseline differences were found between the AI-iCBT and iCBT groups, confirming the comparability of the 2 active interventions.

Participant flow

Automated email reminders were sent to participants twice weekly during the 7-week intervention period. Each week, participants in the intervention groups were required to (1) view an online psychoeducational CBT module and (2) perform their allocated (AI-iCBT or iCBT) CR exercise at least once (6 times or more in total). Waitlist participants did not undergo any exercises during this period. All participants were required to complete assessments at baseline, postintervention (week 7), and follow-up (month 3 after postintervention). All intervention and assessment procedures, including attendance and outcome measures, were conducted online.

Adverse events

No serious adverse events were reported.

Outcome measures

All primary and secondary outcomes were analyzed based on the ITT population.The primary outcome was the mean PHQ-9 score, assessed at baseline, week 7 (postintervention), and month 3 (follow-up). Secondary outcomes include (1) proportion of participants with PHQ-9 scores 10 or more. (2) QIDS-J (3) GAD-7 (4) SDS. Engagement outcome included weekly CR exercise attendance rate in the 2 intervention groups. Program satisfaction at week 7 was assessed with the CSQ-8.

Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Completed

Date of protocol fixation

2015 Year 08 Month 01 Day

Date of IRB

2015 Year 09 Month 28 Day

Anticipated trial start date

2015 Year 10 Month 05 Day

Last follow-up date

2016 Year 06 Month 30 Day

Date of closure to data entry


Date trial data considered complete

2016 Year 05 Month 15 Day

Date analysis concluded

2016 Year 06 Month 20 Day


Other

Other related information



Management information

Registered date

2015 Year 10 Month 04 Day

Last modified on

2026 Year 01 Month 06 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000022220