UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000019413
Receipt number R000022016
Scientific Title Clinical Evaluation of Prosthetic Valve in Patients with Aortic Stenosis
Date of disclosure of the study information 2015/10/19
Last modified on 2019/04/23 12:25:29

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

Clinical Evaluation of Prosthetic Valve in Patients with Aortic Stenosis

Acronym

Clinical Evaluation of Prosthetic Valve in Patients with Aortic Stenosis

Scientific Title

Clinical Evaluation of Prosthetic Valve in Patients with Aortic Stenosis

Scientific Title:Acronym

Clinical Evaluation of Prosthetic Valve in Patients with Aortic Stenosis

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

Aortic Stenosis

Classification by specialty

Cardiovascular surgery

Classification by malignancy

Others

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

Aortic valve replacement (AVR) ia a most common therapy for aortic stenosis (AS). It is a major problem that Japanese people have smaller annuluses than European. Because their annuluses is small, conventional AVR cannot release left ventricular outlet tract obstruction (LVOTO) and improve left ventricular function. Therefore, root enlarging or placing the valve partly in a supraannular position is often performed, however it is difficult in some cases.
Patient-prosthesis mismatch(PPM) is defined that after valve replacement operation the effective orifice area (EOA) of prosthetic valve is smaller than the native valve. According to this definition, in the case that no prohstetic
valve has same orifice area to the normal aortic valve, PPM occurs in all patients after operations. However, PPM is not intercorrelate with the size of prosthetic valve but also with body surface area(BSA), therefore the effective orifice area index(EOAI), that is defined as EOA of the prosthetic valve devided by BSA, are used in evaluating the PPM. We have examined how the PPM effect clinically in AVR, however it is not clear.
In this study, We examine whether ATS 16AP that is the smallest prosthetic valve in the world avoids the PPM.

Basic objectives2

Safety,Efficacy

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1


Trial characteristics_2


Developmental phase



Assessment

Primary outcomes

postoperative cardiac function

Key secondary outcomes



Base

Study type

Observational


Study design

Basic design


Randomization


Randomization unit


Blinding


Control


Stratification


Dynamic allocation


Institution consideration


Blocking


Concealment



Intervention

No. of arms


Purpose of intervention


Type of intervention


Interventions/Control_1


Interventions/Control_2


Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit


Not applicable

Age-upper limit


Not applicable

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

a

Key exclusion criteria

a

Target sample size

100


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name
Middle name
Last name Yoshikatsu Saiki

Organization

Graduate school of medicine

Division name

Division of Cardiovascularsurgery

Zip code


Address

Seiryo1-1,Aoba ward, Sendai city

TEL

022-717-7222

Email

yoshisaiki@med.tohoku.ac.jp


Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name
Middle name
Last name Ko Sakatsume

Organization

Graduate school of medicine

Division name

Division of Cardiovascularsurgery

Zip code


Address

Seiryo1-1,Aoba ward, Sendai city

TEL

022-717-7222

Homepage URL


Email

kosakatsume@gmail.com


Sponsor or person

Institute

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, TOHOKU University Graduate school of medicine

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

none

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Other

Nationality of Funding Organization



Other related organizations

Co-sponsor


Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization


Address


Tel


Email



Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions



Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2015 Year 10 Month 19 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol


Publication of results

Unpublished


Result

URL related to results and publications


Number of participants that the trial has enrolled


Results


Results date posted


Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics


Participant flow


Adverse events


Outcome measures


Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Completed

Date of protocol fixation

2015 Year 09 Month 01 Day

Date of IRB

2014 Year 09 Month 16 Day

Anticipated trial start date

2015 Year 09 Month 01 Day

Last follow-up date

2018 Year 06 Month 30 Day

Date of closure to data entry


Date trial data considered complete


Date analysis concluded



Other

Other related information

This study is a multicenter trial in Tohoku University Hospital and the other hospitals. We examine the cases of AVR performed from January 2008 to August 2015 with ATS16AP. We collect and evaluate the data related to the prognosis and the results of UCG.


Management information

Registered date

2015 Year 10 Month 19 Day

Last modified on

2019 Year 04 Month 23 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000022016