| Recruitment status | Open public recruiting |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000018517 |
| Receipt No. | R000021355 |
| Official scientific title of the study | Cross over trial of GD and GP therapy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma after the failure of cisplatin-based chemotherapy: randomised phase 3 trials |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2015/08/05 |
| Last modified on | 2016/09/17 (Ver. 4) |
| Basic information | ||
| Official scientific title of the study | Cross over trial of GD and GP therapy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma after the failure of cisplatin-based chemotherapy: randomised phase 3 trials | |
| Title of the study (Brief title) | Cross over trial of GD and GP therapy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | ||
| Condition | metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients after the failure in the cisplatin-based first line systemic chemotherapy | |
| Classification by specialty |
|
|
| Classification by malignancy | Malignancy | |
| Genomic information | NO | |
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is considered to be a chemosensitive malignancy. Cisplatin-based systemic chemotherapy is regarded as the gold standard regimens for treating patients with advanced or metastatic UC. For more than a decade, the combination regimens of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, cisplatin (M-VAC) and methotrexate, epirubicin, cisplatin (MEC) chemotherapy have been held as the standard in treating advanced or metastatic UC patients. Objective response rates of these regimens were approximately 50% in randomized trials. Recently, combined chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) has become another standard treatment for advanced UC. However, long-term follow-up results have revealed that overall survival or progression free survival was never satisfactory, particularly with metastatic UC. There is no standard second-line treatment in patients with metastatic UC after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. Therefore, in the present study, we evaluated the feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of sequential therapy using Gemcitabine and docetaxel combination regimen, and Gemcitabine and paclitaxel combination regimen in patients with metastatic UC who were refractory to cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy. |
| Basic objectives2 | Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | Confirmatory |
| Trial characteristics_2 | Pragmatic |
| Developmental phase | Phase III |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | overall survival |
| Key secondary outcomes | adverse event
progression free survival objective response rate |
| Base | |
| Study type | Interventional |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | Parallel |
| Randomization | Randomized |
| Randomization unit | Individual |
| Blinding | Open -no one is blinded |
| Control | Active |
| Stratification | NO |
| Dynamic allocation | YES |
| Institution consideration | |
| Blocking | |
| Concealment | Central registration |
| Intervention | ||
| No. of arms | 2 | |
| Purpose of intervention | Treatment | |
| Type of intervention |
|
|
| Interventions/Control_1 | GD therapy: gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 administered by a 30 min intravenous infusion on days 1, and 8 and docetaxel 40 mg/m2 also by intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8 | |
| Interventions/Control_2 | gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 administered by a 30 min intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15, and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 also by intravenous infusion on days 1 | |
| Interventions/Control_3 | ||
| Interventions/Control_4 | ||
| Interventions/Control_5 | ||
| Interventions/Control_6 | ||
| Interventions/Control_7 | ||
| Interventions/Control_8 | ||
| Interventions/Control_9 | ||
| Interventions/Control_10 | ||
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | Eligible patients had histologically proven metastatic UC of the urinary bladder or upper urinary tract. All of the patients had received surgical treatment or been biopsied for the primary lesions. Also, all had one previous chemotherapy treatment that consisted of M-VAC, MEC, or GC. Previous chemotherapy was completed at least 4 weeks before enrollment. Patients were required to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) of 2 or lower as per the World Health Organization criteria; adequate bone marrow reserve (white blood cell (WBC) count higher than 3,500, platelet count higher than 100,000, and hemoglobin higher than 10 g/dL) was required of all patients. Other requirements were: adequate hepatic function (serum bilirubin 1.5 mg/dl, or less), adequate renal function (serum creatinine 1.5 mg/dl, or measured creatinine clearance of at least 60 ml/min), and an estimated life expectancy of at least 12 weeks. Patients with non-malignant systemic disease that precluded them from receiving therapy, including active infection, any clinically significant cardiac arrhythmia, and/or congestive heart failure, were not eligible. Written informed consent was obtained from all of the patients before this clinical trial. | |||
| Key exclusion criteria | exclusion criteria patients were below: the patients who had allergy to gemcitabine, and , or taxane derivatives, or patients suspected interstitial lung disease by X ray, or patients who had past history of radiation theapy in chest, or patients suspected infection diseases, or patients who had the possibility of pregnancy, or patients who had uncontrolled cancer diffferent from urothelial cancer. | |||
| Target sample size | 60 | |||
| Research contact person | |
| Name of lead principal investigator | Taku Naiki |
| Organization | Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences |
| Division name | Department of Nephro-urology |
| Address | Kawasumi 1, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku 467-8601, Nagoya, Japan. |
| TEL | 052-853-8266 |
| naiki@med.nagoya-cu.ac.jp | |
| Public contact | |
| Name of contact person | Taku Naiki |
| Organization | Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences |
| Division name | Department of Nephro-urology |
| Address | Kawasumi 1, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku 467-8601, Nagoya, Japan. |
| TEL | 052-853-8266 |
| Homepage URL | |
| naiki@med.nagoya-cu.ac.jp | |
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | none |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Other |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | 名古屋市立大学病院 |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Open public recruiting | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date | |||||||
| Date of closure to data entry | |||||||
| Date trial data considered complete | |||||||
| Date analysis concluded | |||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | |
| Publication of results | Unpublished |
| URL releasing results | |
| Results | |
| Other related information | |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/icdr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000021355 |