| Recruitment status | Completed |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000017727 |
| Receipt No. | R000020520 |
| Official scientific title of the study | Corrected VA with Long Term Follow up after AcrySof IOL Implantation |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2015/06/01 |
| Last modified on | 2016/11/24 (Ver. 4) |
| Basic information | ||
| Official scientific title of the study | Corrected VA with Long Term Follow up
after AcrySof IOL Implantation |
|
| Title of the study (Brief title) | Corrected VA with Long Term Follow up
after AcrySof IOL Implantation |
|
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | |||
| Condition | Cataract | ||
| Classification by specialty |
|
||
| Classification by malignancy | Others | ||
| Genomic information | NO | ||
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | To demonstrate non-inferiority of AcrySof (acrylic) to control IOLs (silicone and PMMA) in BCVA change at the long-term post-implantation (implantation period is 1994 to 2000) visit. |
| Basic objectives2 | Safety,Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | |
| Trial characteristics_2 | |
| Developmental phase | |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | BCVA change at the long term post implantation visit from within 3 months after IOL implantation |
| Key secondary outcomes | |
| Base | |
| Study type | Interventional |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | Parallel |
| Randomization | Non-randomized |
| Randomization unit | |
| Blinding | Open -but assessor(s) are blinded |
| Control | Active |
| Stratification | |
| Dynamic allocation | |
| Institution consideration | |
| Blocking | |
| Concealment | |
| Intervention | ||
| No. of arms | 3 | |
| Purpose of intervention | Prevention | |
| Type of intervention |
|
|
| Interventions/Control_1 | AcrySof group | |
| Interventions/Control_2 | PMMA group | |
| Interventions/Control_3 | Slicone group | |
| Interventions/Control_4 | ||
| Interventions/Control_5 | ||
| Interventions/Control_6 | ||
| Interventions/Control_7 | ||
| Interventions/Control_8 | ||
| Interventions/Control_9 | ||
| Interventions/Control_10 | ||
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | 1)Willing to provide voluntary consent and able to comprehend and sign the informed consent form
2)Pseudophakic patients who were implanted with an Acrylic (AcrySof), PMMA or silicone IOL from 1994 to 2000. 3)Clear intraocular media in study eyes 4)Best corrected visual acuity (decimal) within 3 months post implantation is 0.8 (decimal VA chart) or more in study eye. 5)Patient who does not have an ocular or systemic condition which may affect visual acuity in study eye. |
|||
| Key exclusion criteria | 1)Patient who has the following complications that may have an impact on visual acuity at the time of the prospective visit in study eye.
-Glaucoma -Diabetic retinitis -Ocular inflammatory disease; scleritis, uveitis, herpes corneae, etc. -Retinal detachment -Abnormal retina and fovea; Macular degeneration, retinal disease -Corneal disease, corneal endothelial cell loss, etc. -History of keratoplasty -Ocular trauma -Intraocular surgery post IOL implantation Occur with post capsular Opacification. Eyes that had YAG laser performed or with peripheral opacification (outside the photopic pupil size) will be allowed in the study 2)Previous refractive surgery in study eye 3)Previous IOL exchange in study eye 4)Disqualified by the investigator or the sub investigator because of systemic or ophthalmic diseases |
|||
| Target sample size | 90 | |||
| Research contact person | |
| Name of lead principal investigator | Kazunori Miyata |
| Organization | Miyata Eye Hospital |
| Division name | Miyata Eye Hospital |
| Address | 6-3 Kurahara Miyakonojo Miyazaki |
| TEL | 0986-22-1441 |
| miyata@miyata-med.ne.jp | |
| Public contact | |
| Name of contact person | Koji Hasegawa |
| Organization | Alcon Japan Ltd. |
| Division name | Clinical Development, Clinical & Regulatory Affairs |
| Address | 1-23-1 Toranomon, Minato-ku, Tokyo |
| TEL | 03-6899-5061 |
| Homepage URL | |
| koji.hasegawa@alcon.com | |
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Alcon Japan Ltd. |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | Alcon Japan Ltd. |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Profit organization |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Completed | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date | |||||||
| Date of closure to data entry | |||||||
| Date trial data considered complete | |||||||
| Date analysis concluded | |||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | |
| Publication of results | Unpublished |
| URL releasing results | |
| Results | The mean change in logMAR best-corrected visual acuity from baseline at the long-term post-implantation follow-up visit was 0.01, 0.04, and -0.01 in the AcrySof, silicone, and PMMA groups, respectively. The upper limit of 97.5% one-sided confidence interval of the difference in the change in best-corrected visual acuity between the AcrySof group and each control group was +0.01 logMAR for the silicone group and +0.07 logMAR for the PMMA group, both of which were lower than the non-inferiority margin of +0.1 logMAR. |
| Other related information | Prospective adverse events were observed in the target eye for efficacy analysis of 1 subject (3.2%) in the AcrySof group and in the contralateral eye of 1 subject (3.3%) in the PMMA group. None of these events were considered to be related to the IOL.
Retrospective adverse events were observed in 1 subject (3.2%) in the AcrySof group, 3 subjects (8.1%) in the silicone group, and 4 subjects (13.3%) in the PMMA group. None of these events were considered to be related to the IOL. A retrospective adverse reaction was observed in 1 subject (2.7%) in the silicone group. The causal relationship between this event and the IOL was considered unknown by the investigator, and the event was therefore classified as an adverse reaction. No device failures were observed. |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000020520 |