| Recruitment status | Completed |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000015532 |
| Receipt No. | R000018041 |
| Official scientific title of the study | Exploratory clinical study concerning the efficacy of "steroid injection" and "shielding method with polyglycolic acid sheets and fibrin glue" for the prevention of postoperative stricture after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial esophageal neoplasms. |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2014/10/26 |
| Last modified on | 2016/04/12 (Ver. 7) |
| Basic information | ||
| Official scientific title of the study | Exploratory clinical study concerning the efficacy of "steroid injection" and "shielding method with polyglycolic acid sheets and fibrin glue" for the prevention of postoperative stricture after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial esophageal neoplasms. | |
| Title of the study (Brief title) | The efficacy of "steroid injection" and "shielding method with polyglycolic acid sheets and fibrin glue" for the prevention of postoperative stricture after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection. | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | |||
| Condition | Superficial esophageal neoplasms (either squamous cell carcinoma or basaloid carcinoma) | ||
| Classification by specialty |
|
||
| Classification by malignancy | Malignancy | ||
| Genomic information | NO | ||
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | By applying "steroid injection" and "shielding method with polyglycolic acid sheets and fibrin glue" after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection, there is a high probability that the risk of post-ESD stricture as well as risks associated with "steroid injection" alone will be minimized. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and risks of combining these methods. |
| Basic objectives2 | Safety,Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | |
| Trial characteristics_2 | |
| Developmental phase | |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | Number of endoscopic balloon dilation sessions required (within 12 weeks after ESD) |
| Key secondary outcomes | |
| In outcomes field, the entry of just a few words such as "safety" or "efficiency" will not be accepted. Specify the name of outcome measures, including the time when you plan to measure. Usually, only one primary outcome is accepted. Write the other outcomes in "secondary outcomes" field. |
| Base | |
| Study type | Interventional |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | Single arm |
| Randomization | Non-randomized |
| Randomization unit | |
| Blinding | Open -no one is blinded |
| Control | Uncontrolled |
| Stratification | |
| Dynamic allocation | |
| Institution consideration | |
| Blocking | |
| Concealment | |
| Intervention | ||||
| No. of arms | 1 | |||
| Purpose of intervention | Prevention | |||
| Type of intervention |
|
|||
| Interventions/Control_1 | Application of "steroid injection" and "shielding method with polyglycolic acid sheets and fibrin glue" after esophageal ESD. | |||
| Interventions/Control_2 | ||||
| Interventions/Control_3 | ||||
| Interventions/Control_4 | ||||
| Interventions/Control_5 | ||||
| Interventions/Control_6 | ||||
| Interventions/Control_7 | ||||
| Interventions/Control_8 | ||||
| Interventions/Control_9 | ||||
| Interventions/Control_10 | ||||
| In interventions field, include the details of interventions, such as duration, amount, and frequency. If the intervention includes prescription or use of medical devices, duration is required. |
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | 1) Superficial esophageal neoplasm (either squamous cell carcinoma or basaloid carcinoma) is pathologically diagnosed by endoscopic biopsy.
2) The neoplasm is located in the thoracic esophagus. 3) Lymph node metastasis is ruled out through CT examination. 4) The neoplasm meets either of the 2 following criteria: 1. a single neoplasm covering over half the circumference of the esophagus 2. multiple neoplasms that will require mucosal resection of over 3/4 the circumference of the esophagus 5) There will be only a single ESD defect. 6) The patient must be above 20 years of age. 7) The performance status of the patient must be 0-2. 8) The patient's dysphagia score must be 0. 9) Blood examination results must meet the following criteria: 1.Hb>=8.0g/dL 2.Plt>=100,000/mm3 3.AST,ALT<=150 4.Cre<=2.0mg/dL 10) Followup of the patient for 12 weeks after ESD must be possible. 11) Informed consent after sufficient explanation must be obtained. |
|||
| Key exclusion criteria | 1) The patient has received endoscopic treatment of the upper GI tract within 30 days of entry.
2) The patient is to receive endoscopic treatment of either the stomach or duodenum in the same session. 3) The patient has plans of receiving endoscopic treatment of the upper GI tract within 12 weeks. 4) The patient has allergy to either Lugol staining, polyglycolic acid, steroids, PPIs. 5) Possibility of pregnancy 6) Neuropsychiatric symptoms which may impair comprehension of the study. 7) A history of either angina or cardiac infarction within 3 months 8) Uncontrolled hypertension 9) Others |
|||
| Target sample size | 15 | |||
| Research contact person | |
| Name of lead principal investigator | Satoshi Ono |
| Organization | The University of Tokyo Hospital |
| Division name | The Department of Gastroenterology |
| Address | 7-3-1 Hongou, Bunkyou-ku, Tokyo |
| TEL | 03-3815-5411 |
| satono-tky@umin.ac.jp | |
| Public contact | |
| Name of contact person | Yoshiki Sakaguchi |
| Organization | The University of Tokyo Hospital |
| Division name | The Department of Gastroenterology |
| Address | 7-3-1 Hongou, Bunkyou-ku, Tokyo |
| TEL | 03-3815-5411 |
| Homepage URL | |
| sakaguchi-tky@umin.ac.jp | |
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | The University of Tokyo Hospital |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Sponsor means an organization that is responsible for plan, deployment and report of the research including funding management. It doesn't mean funding agency". Therefore, all clinical trial should have the one. |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | The University of Tokyo Hospital |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Self funding |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Completed | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry | |||||||
| Date trial data considered complete | |||||||
| Date analysis concluded |
|
||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | |
| Publication of results | Published |
| URL releasing results | |
| Results | published doi:10.1038/ajg.2016.60
Between December 2014 and July 2015, 15 patients were enrolled. Each underwent per-protocol treatment with an ESD defect of over 3/4 the circumference of the esophagus. Four patients were excluded from analysis due to salvage esophagectomy. The remaining 11 patients (2 total circumferential, 9 semi-circumferential) were followed for 12 weeks. Postoperative stricture occurred in 18.2% (2/11), with a median of 0 sessions of EBD required. Postoperative stricture was successfully prevented in one case of total circumferential resection. Of the semi-circumferential cases, postoperative stricture occurred in 11.1% (1/9), with a median of 0 EBD sessions. |
| Other related information | |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000018041 |