Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000015392 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000017756 |
Scientific Title | Analysis of efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with Sonazoid on treatment evaluation after local therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (Comparison with transvenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography) |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2014/10/10 |
Last modified on | 2014/10/09 19:21:48 |
Analysis of efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with Sonazoid on treatment evaluation after local therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (Comparison with transvenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography)
Efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography on treatment evaluation after local therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma
Analysis of efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with Sonazoid on treatment evaluation after local therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (Comparison with transvenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography)
Efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography on treatment evaluation after local therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma
Japan |
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Hepato-biliary-pancreatic medicine |
Malignancy
NO
To evaluate the efficacy on treatment evaluation for hepatocellular carcinoma with hypervascular using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography
Efficacy
To evaluate the treatment evaluation for hepatocelluar carcinoma after local therapy using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography in six months after the treatment
Interventional
Single arm
Non-randomized
Open -no one is blinded
Uncontrolled
1
Diagnosis
Medicine |
Microbubble contrast agents; Sonazoid
20 | years-old | <= |
80 | years-old | >= |
Male and Female
1. Patients who were diagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma with hypervascular using intravenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography
2. Patients who were planned to receive percutaneous radiofrequency ablation or percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (Hepatic arterial embolization is not exclusion criteria)
3. Patients who were planned to receive intravenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography for treatment evaluation
4. Having received adequate explanation of the contents of the trial and given their written consent
1. Egg allergy
2. Severe lung disease
3. Severe heart disease
4. Allergic to iodine
5. Difficult to follow up in our hospital
6. Determined to be ineligible by the physician in charge for any other reason
100
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Hitoshi Maruyama |
Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine
Department of Gastroenterology and Nephrology
1-8-1, Inohana, Chuou-ku, Chiba, Japan
043-226-2083
maru-cib@umin.ac.jp
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Hitoshi Maruyama |
Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine
Department of Gastroenterology and Nephrology
1-8-1, Inohana, Chuou-ku, Chiba, Japan
043-226-2083
maru-cib@umin.ac.jp
Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology and Nephrology
Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology and Nephrology
Self funding
NO
2014 | Year | 10 | Month | 10 | Day |
Unpublished
Open public recruiting
2008 | Year | 07 | Month | 23 | Day |
2008 | Year | 08 | Month | 01 | Day |
2014 | Year | 10 | Month | 09 | Day |
2014 | Year | 10 | Month | 09 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000017756