| Recruitment status | Main results already published |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000013979 |
| Receipt No. | R000016287 |
| Official scientific title of the study | The development and Evaluation of Smartphone Website Supporting Antenatal Perineal Massage Practice for Pregnant Women |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2014/05/16 |
| Last modified on | 2016/05/16 (Ver. 4) |
| Basic information | ||
| Official scientific title of the study | The development and Evaluation of Smartphone Website Supporting Antenatal Perineal Massage Practice for Pregnant Women | |
| Title of the study (Brief title) | Investigation of the Effectiveness of Antenatal Perineal Massage Practice Educational Material for Pregnant Women | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | ||||
| Condition | Primiparous pregnant women | |||
| Classification by specialty |
|
|||
| Classification by malignancy | Others | |||
| Genomic information | NO | |||
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | To develop a smartphone website supporting antenatal perineal massage practice and verify the usability for primiparous pregnant women. |
| Basic objectives2 | Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | Confirmatory |
| Trial characteristics_2 | Pragmatic |
| Developmental phase | Not applicable |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | Continuation rate of antenatal perineal massage practice |
| Key secondary outcomes | 1) Evaluation of antenatal perineal massage practice
2) Satisfaction with an effort during pregnancy period 3) Childbirth self-efficacy 4) The degree of perineal trauma following childbirth |
| In outcomes field, the entry of just a few words such as "safety" or "efficiency" will not be accepted. Specify the name of outcome measures, including the time when you plan to measure. Usually, only one primary outcome is accepted. Write the other outcomes in "secondary outcomes" field. |
| Base | |
| Study type | Interventional |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | Parallel |
| Randomization | Randomized |
| Randomization unit | Individual |
| Blinding | Open -no one is blinded |
| Control | Active |
| Stratification | NO |
| Dynamic allocation | NO |
| Institution consideration | Institution is considered as a block. |
| Blocking | YES |
| Concealment | Numbered container method |
| Intervention | ||
| No. of arms | 2 | |
| Purpose of intervention | Educational,Counseling,Training | |
| Type of intervention |
|
|
| Interventions/Control_1 | Smartphone website | |
| Interventions/Control_2 | Leaflet | |
| Interventions/Control_3 | ||
| Interventions/Control_4 | ||
| Interventions/Control_5 | ||
| Interventions/Control_6 | ||
| Interventions/Control_7 | ||
| Interventions/Control_8 | ||
| Interventions/Control_9 | ||
| Interventions/Control_10 | ||
| In interventions field, include the details of interventions, such as duration, amount, and frequency. If the intervention includes prescription or use of medical devices, duration is required. |
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | Correspond to all the following in recruitment for participants at 30-33 weeks of gestation.
(1)The progress of pregnancy is well. (2)Pregnant women are primipara. (3)Pregnant women could read and write Japanese. (4)Pregnant women have smartphone. |
|||
| Key exclusion criteria | Correspond to each the following in recruitment for participants at 30-33 weeks of gestation.
(1) breech presentation (2) multiple pregnancy (3) Pregnant women are expected to deliver a baby by Caesarean section. |
|||
| Target sample size | 128 | |||
| Research contact person | |
| Name of lead principal investigator | Shoko Takeuchi |
| Organization | Yokohama City University |
| Division name | School of Medicine, Nursing Course |
| Address | 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama |
| TEL | 045-787-2548 |
| shoko@yokohama-cu.ac.jp | |
| Public contact | |
| Name of contact person | Shoko Takeuchi |
| Organization | Yokohama City University |
| Division name | School of Medicine, Nursing Course |
| Address | 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama |
| TEL | 045-787-2548 |
| Homepage URL | |
| shoko@yokohama-cu.ac.jp | |
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | St. Luke's International University |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Sponsor means an organization that is responsible for plan, deployment and report of the research including funding management. It doesn't mean funding agency". Therefore, all clinical trial should have the one. |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | YAMAJI FUMIKO NURSING RESEARCH FUND |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Other |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | Japan |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Main results already published | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry |
|
||||||
| Date trial data considered complete | |||||||
| Date analysis concluded |
|
||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | |
| Publication of results | Published |
| URL releasing results | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871519216000342 |
| Results | 1. Of the 161 women participants, 47 in the smartphone website group and 49 in the leaflet group completed all questionnaires.
2. Primary outcome was continuance rate (three times a week over a three week period) of antenatal perineal massage practice. The rates by a per protocol analysis were 51.1% in the smartphone website group and 51.0% in the leaflet group, respectively. There was no significant difference between the groups. Moreover, the rates by an intention to treat analysis were 29.6% in the smartphone website group and 31.3% in the leaflet group, respectively. There was also no significant difference between the groups. 3. There were no significant differences in the evaluation of perineal massage, childbirth self-efficacy, satisfaction with efforts towards childbirth, and perineal outcomes following childbirth which were measured as secondary outcomes between the groups. |
| Other related information | |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/icdr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000016287 |