Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000013887 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000016200 |
Scientific Title | A prospective, randomized, controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of endoscopic sphincterotomy with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2014/05/08 |
Last modified on | 2022/11/10 18:26:18 |
A prospective, randomized, controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of endoscopic sphincterotomy with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones
EST vs EPLBD for removal of bile ductal stones
A prospective, randomized, controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of endoscopic sphincterotomy with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones
EST vs EPLBD for removal of bile ductal stones
Japan |
bile duct stones, ductal stones
Hepato-biliary-pancreatic medicine |
Others
NO
To compare the effectiveness of EST with EPLBD for removal of common bile duct stones
Safety
Confirmatory
Pragmatic
Phase III
1) total time for removal of bile duct stones
2) total sessions of ERCP
1)early and late complication rates
2)recurrence rate
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Open -no one is blinded
Active
NO
YES
Institution is not considered as adjustment factor.
NO
Central registration
2
Treatment
Device,equipment | Maneuver |
EST group 30 cases
5/8/2014-5/7/2015
EPLBD group 30 cases
5/8/2014-5/7/2015
60 | years-old | <= |
Not applicable |
Male and Female
1. A minor diameter of stone is larger than 10 mm.
2. Patients in whom papilla of Vater have not been treated endoscopically or surgically.
3. In emergent cases, patients in whom underwent EST or EBD within a week.
4. Patients in whom CT is performed before endoscopic procedures.
5. Patients in whom written informed consent is obtained.
1. Patients who underwent reconstruction of upper digestive tract(Bil II or RY)
2. Patients who underwent EST or EPBD previously.
3. Performance status is 4.
4. ASA physical status is more than 3.
5. Patients who undergo hemodaialysis.
6. Judged as inadequate for this study by the investigator.
7. Patients who become serious after first procedure.
60
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Kiyohito Tanaka |
Kyoto 2nd red cross hospital
Gastroenterology and hepatology
355-5 Haruobicho Kamannza Marutamachi Kamigyo ward Kyoto city
075-231-5171
seijin7705@gmail.com
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Kazuhide Higuchi |
Osaka Medical College
2nd department of internal medicine
2-7Daigakucho Takatsuki city Osaka
072-683-1221
higuchi@poh.osaka-med.ac.jp
Kansai Endoscopic Device Selection (EDS) Working Group
Kansai Endoscopic Device Selection (EDS) Working Group
Self funding
NO
2014 | Year | 05 | Month | 08 | Day |
Unpublished
Terminated
2014 | Year | 03 | Month | 11 | Day |
2022 | Year | 11 | Month | 10 | Day |
2014 | Year | 05 | Month | 08 | Day |
2022 | Year | 11 | Month | 10 | Day |
2014 | Year | 05 | Month | 06 | Day |
2022 | Year | 11 | Month | 10 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000016200