UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Recruitment status Completed
Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000027925
Receipt No. R000016182
Official scientific title of the study Comparison of video laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation in ER and ICU
Date of disclosure of the study information 2017/06/26
Last modified on 2017/06/25 (Ver. 1)

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information
Official scientific title of the study Comparison of video laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation in ER and ICU
Title of the study (Brief title) Comparison of video laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation in ER and ICU
Region
Japan

Condition
Condition cases of emergency TI
Classification by specialty
Emergency medicine Intensive care medicine
Classification by malignancy Others
Genomic information NO

Objectives
Narrative objectives1 To compare the superiority and safety among three video laryngoscopes (Pentax-Airway Scope, King Vison, McGrath MAC) and conventional Macintosh laryngoscope in emergency and critical care setting.
Basic objectives2 Safety,Efficacy
Basic objectives -Others
Trial characteristics_1
Trial characteristics_2
Developmental phase

Assessment
Primary outcomes First attempt success rate of tracheal intubation
Key secondary outcomes Time needed to perform TI
Subjective difficulty scale
Complications and esophageal intubation

Base
Study type Observational

Study design
Basic design
Randomization
Randomization unit
Blinding
Control
Stratification
Dynamic allocation
Institution consideration
Blocking
Concealment

Intervention
No. of arms
Purpose of intervention
Type of intervention
Interventions/Control_1
Interventions/Control_2
Interventions/Control_3
Interventions/Control_4
Interventions/Control_5
Interventions/Control_6
Interventions/Control_7
Interventions/Control_8
Interventions/Control_9
Interventions/Control_10

Eligibility
Age-lower limit

Not applicable
Age-upper limit

Not applicable
Gender Male and Female
Key inclusion criteria Patients who required emergency tracheal intubation in the emergency department and intensive care unit with video recording.
Key exclusion criteria none
Target sample size 280

Research contact person
Name of lead principal investigator Kei Suzuki
Organization Hiroshima University
Division name Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine
Address 1-2-3Kasumi,Minami-ku,Hiroshima 734-8551 Japan
TEL 0822575456
Email suzukik@hiroshima-u.ac.jp

Public contact
Name of contact person Kei Suzuki
Organization Hiroshima University
Division name Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine
Address 1-2-3Kasumi,Minami-ku,Hiroshima 734-8551 Japan
TEL 0822575456
Homepage URL
Email suzukik@hiroshima-u.ac.jp

Sponsor
Institute Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hiroshima University
Institute
Department

Funding Source
Organization Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hiroshima University
Organization
Division
Category of Funding Organization Other
Nationality of Funding Organization

Other related organizations
Co-sponsor Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital
Name of secondary funder(s)

Secondary IDs
Secondary IDs NO
Study ID_1
Org. issuing International ID_1
Study ID_2
Org. issuing International ID_2
IND to MHLW

Institutions
Institutions 広島大学病院(広島県) 県立広島病院(広島県)

Other administrative information
Date of disclosure of the study information
2017 Year 06 Month 26 Day

Progress
Recruitment status Completed
Date of protocol fixation
2013 Year 11 Month 01 Day
Anticipated trial start date
2013 Year 12 Month 17 Day
Last follow-up date
Date of closure to data entry
Date trial data considered complete
Date analysis concluded

Related information
URL releasing protocol
Publication of results Unpublished
URL releasing results
Results 287 cases were enrolled. First attempt success rate differed significantly among the 4 laryngoscopes (Pentax-Airway Scope, AWS=78%, King VISION, KV=58%, McGrath MAC, McG=78%, and Macintosh laryngoscope, ML=58%, p=0.004). In post hoc analysis, AWS or McG had higher first attempt success rate compared with KV or ML respectively. In non-experts subgroup, first attempt success rate was differed among 4 laryngoscopes (87%, 50% 78% and 46%, p=0.00004) and AWS or McG had significantly higher first attempt success rate compared with KV or ML respectively, but not in experts subgroup (67% vs 67% vs 78% vs 78%, p=0.556). After adjusting for indications of tracheal intubation, limited mouth opening, restricted neck mobilization, bloods/secretion/vomitus in airway, expert/non-expert, use of AWS (odds ratio 3.422, 95% confidence interval 1.551-7.550, p=0.002) and McG (3.758, 1.640-8.612, p=0.002) were associated with increased odds of first attempt success.
Other related information There was a significant difference in time needed to perform TI (mean) among 4 laryngoscopes (63, 63, 62 and 52 sec, p=0.043) with no differences detected in post hoc analysis. There was a significant difference in difficulty score (mean) among 4 laryngoscopes (39, 43, 32 and 45, p=0.009) and McG was evaluated as easier than ML in post hoc analysis (p=0.027). There was no difference between 4 laryngoscopes about complications.

Management information
Registered date
2017 Year 06 Month 25 Day
Last modified on
2017 Year 06 Month 25 Day


Link to view the page
URL(English) https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000016182