Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000012151 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000014184 |
Scientific Title | Phase 1 and 2 study on Negative-balance isolated pelvic perfusion |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2013/10/29 |
Last modified on | 2016/05/06 11:23:37 |
Phase 1 and 2 study on Negative-balance isolated pelvic perfusion
Phase 1 and 2 study on NIPP
Phase 1 and 2 study on Negative-balance isolated pelvic perfusion
Phase 1 and 2 study on NIPP
Japan | North America | Europe |
Advanced bladder cancer
Advanced uterine cancer
Recurrent rectal cancer
Gastroenterology | Gastrointestinal surgery | Obstetrics and Gynecology |
Urology | Radiology |
Malignancy
NO
To evaluate efficacy and safety of Negative-balanced isolated pelvic perfusion for advanced bladder and uterine cancer, and recurrent rectal cancer.
Safety,Efficacy
5-year survival rate
Progression free survival
Antitumor effect (RECIST)
Adverse events (CTCAE grade) within 4 weeks after treatment
Performance status
Visual analog scale
Interventional
Single arm
Non-randomized
Open -but assessor(s) are blinded
Historical
1
Treatment
Device,equipment | Maneuver |
Establish isolated pelvic perfusion using balloon catheters. Perform the procedure more than twice, more than 2 weeks apart.
Initial dose is cisplatin 190mg/m2 plus 5-FU 2000mg/m2 for bladder cancer, cisplatin 190mg/m2 plus 5-FU 2000mg/m2 for uterine cervical cancer and rectal cancer, and cisplatin 190mg/m2 plus 5-FU 2000mg/m2 for uterine body cancer.
Not applicable |
85 | years-old | >= |
Male and Female
1. Written informed consent
2. No indication of surgical resection
3. Apparent increase in tumor size after performing chemotherapy and radiation therapy according to a standard protocol
4. Performance status of 0-2 according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score
5. Acceptable renal function (serum creatinine less than 1.2 mg/dl)
6. Acceptable bone marrow function (leukocyte count 3500/mm3 or more, and platelet count 50000/mm3 or more).
1. Contraindication to angiography (due to severe side effect of contrast media)
2. High risk for general anesthesia
3. Severe comorbidities
4. Vascular anatomy not suitable for catheterization
60
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Satoru Murata |
Nippon medical school
Department of Radiology
Sendagi 1-1-5, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo
03-3822-2131
genji@nms.ac.jp
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Satoru Murata |
Nippon medical school
Department of Radiology
Sendagi 1-1-5, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo
03-3822-2131
genji@nms.ac.jp
Nippon medical school
Nippon medical school
Self funding
NO
2013 | Year | 10 | Month | 29 | Day |
Unpublished
2013 | Year | 10 | Month | 28 | Day |
2013 | Year | 10 | Month | 29 | Day |
2013 | Year | 10 | Month | 28 | Day |
2016 | Year | 05 | Month | 06 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000014184