| Recruitment status | Main results already published |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000012179 |
| Receipt No. | R000014038 |
| Scientific Title | Bevacizumab plus paclitaxel optimization study with interventional maintenance endocrine therapy in advanced or metastatic ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer-BOOSTER trial, a multicenter randomized phase II study |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2013/10/31 |
| Last modified on | 2022/07/16 (Ver. 28) |
| Basic information | ||
| Public title | Bevacizumab plus paclitaxel optimization study with interventional maintenance endocrine therapy in advanced or metastatic ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer-BOOSTER trial, a multicenter randomized phase II study | |
| Acronym | JBCRG-M04 (BOOSTER) | |
| Scientific Title | Bevacizumab plus paclitaxel optimization study with interventional maintenance endocrine therapy in advanced or metastatic ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer-BOOSTER trial, a multicenter randomized phase II study | |
| Scientific Title:Acronym | JBCRG-M04 (BOOSTER) | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | ||||
| Condition | Hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative advanced or recurrence (metastatic) breast cancer | |||
| Classification by specialty |
|
|||
| Classification by malignancy | Malignancy | |||
| Genomic information | YES | |||
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | To compare continuing bevacizumab + paclitaxel or switching to bevacizumab + endocrine maintenance therapy followed by bevacizumab + paclitaxel, after 1st line induction therapy with bevacizumab + paclitaxel in
ER+HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer. |
| Basic objectives2 | Safety,Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | Exploratory |
| Trial characteristics_2 | Explanatory |
| Developmental phase | Phase II |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | Time to failure of strategy (TFS) |
| Key secondary outcomes | 2y Overall Survival rate, Overall Survival, Progression Free Survival: PFS, QOL, Biomarker, Safety |
| Base | |
| Study type | Interventional |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | Parallel |
| Randomization | Randomized |
| Randomization unit | Individual |
| Blinding | Open -no one is blinded |
| Control | Active |
| Stratification | YES |
| Dynamic allocation | YES |
| Institution consideration | Institution is considered as adjustment factor in dynamic allocation. |
| Blocking | NO |
| Concealment | Central registration |
| Intervention | ||
| No. of arms | 2 | |
| Purpose of intervention | Treatment | |
| Type of intervention |
|
|
| Interventions/Control_1 | weekly paclitaxel + bevacizumab | |
| Interventions/Control_2 | endocrine therapy + bevacizumab then back to weekly paclitaxel + bevacizumab therapy | |
| Interventions/Control_3 | ||
| Interventions/Control_4 | ||
| Interventions/Control_5 | ||
| Interventions/Control_6 | ||
| Interventions/Control_7 | ||
| Interventions/Control_8 | ||
| Interventions/Control_9 | ||
| Interventions/Control_10 | ||
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the breast
2. Female aged 20-75 years old at getting informed consent 3. HER2 negative disease (IHC 0/1+ or 2+ with FISH negative) 4. Documented estrogen receptor (ER) positive (>=1% by IHC) 5. Inoperative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer at enrolment 6. Performance status (ECOG): 0-1 at enrolment 7. Life expectancy of at least 3 months from enrolment 8. No prior systemic therapy for recurrent breast cancer (excluding hormone therapy) 9. No prior neo and/or adjuvant chemotherapy with taxane or adjuvant setting with a disease-free interval from completion of the taxane treatment to metastatic diagnosis of >= 12 months 10. Patients with measurable lesion regarding with RECIST criteria or who have evaluable lesion 11. Patients with only bone lesion will be acceptable if the osteolytic lesion has a measurable soft tissue component by MRI or CT 12. No influence on protocol treatment is considered in case prior therapy or examination. 13. Adequate following organ function within 2 weeks before starting treatment. The latest examination results should be adopted and blood transfusion or treatment of hematopoietic factor drugs is not allowed 2 weeks before examination. - Absolute neutrophil count >= 1500 /mm3 or WBC count >= 3000 /mm3 - Platelets >=10 x 10000 /mm3 - Hb >= 9 g/dL - Total bilirubin <= 1.5 mg/dL(except for constitutional jaundice) - AST and ALT <= 100IU/L (<=200IU/L if liver metastasis) - Serum creatinine <= 1.5 mg/dL -Urine dipstick for proteinuria <= 1+ 14. Written informed consent signed by patients before completing any treatment related procedure |
|||
| Key exclusion criteria | (1)Prior therapy with bevacizumab
(2) Active infection requiring intrvenous antibiotics at enrollment or infection with active HBV and/or HCV. (3) Pregnancy, lactetion or in case of potentialy pregnancy women Not mind contraception in trial period. (4) Known hypersensitivity to bevacizumab or paclitaxel (5) History of hemoptysis (>= 2.5mL of bright red blood per episord). (6) Use of disulfiram,cyanamide, carmofur or procarbazine Hydrochloride (7) Patients with CNS metastases (except for not symptomatic) (8) Persistent Grade >= 2 sensory neuropathy at enrollment (9) Grade 3 >= hypertension (>= 2 use of antihypertensive drug) 10) Evidence with arterial thromboembolism (Cerebral infarction, Myocardial infarction) or history within 1 year prior to enrollment. (11) Evidence withvenous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism) or history within 1 year prior to enrollment. (12) History of GI perforation and/or serious abdominal fistula within 1 year prior to enrollment (13) Cases that the investigator judged as inappropriate as the subject of this clinical study |
|||
| Target sample size | 160 | |||
| Research contact person | |||||||
| Name of lead principal investigator |
|
||||||
| Organization | 1) Fukushima Medical University
2) Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine |
||||||
| Division name | 1) Department of Medical Oncology, 2) Department of Breast Surgery | ||||||
| Zip code | 1)960-1295,2)606-8507 | ||||||
| Address | 1) 1 Hikariga-oka, Fukushima City, 960-1295 JAPAN, 2) 54 Shogoin Kawara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, JAPAN | ||||||
| TEL | 024-547-1511 | ||||||
| ss-saji@wa2.so-net.ne.jp | |||||||
| Public contact | |||||||
| Name of contact person |
|
||||||
| Organization | Japan Breast Cancer Research Group (JBCRG) | ||||||
| Division name | Head office | ||||||
| Zip code | 103-0016 | ||||||
| Address | 3rd Floor, Nihonbashikoamicho9-4, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-0016, JAPAN | ||||||
| TEL | 03-6264-8873 | ||||||
| Homepage URL | https://www.jbcrg.jp/ | ||||||
| office@jbcrg.jp | |||||||
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Japan Breast Cancer Research Group (JBCRG) |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Profit organization |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | Japan |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| IRB Contact (For public release) | |
| Organization | Fukushima Medical University Certified Review Board |
| Address | 1 Hikariga-oka, Fukushima City, 960-1295 JAPAN |
| Tel | 024-547-1825 |
| fmucrb@fmu.ac.jp | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | YES |
| Study ID_1 | NCT01989780 |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | 公立大学法人福島県立医科大学附属病院(福島県)、弘前市立病院(青森県)、久留米大学病院(福岡県)、京都大学医学部附属病院(京都府)、国家公務員共済組合連合会虎の門病院(東京都)、埼玉県立がんセンター(埼玉県)、愛知県がんセンター(愛知県)、横浜市立大学附属市民総合医療センター(神奈川県)、北海道大学病院(北海道)、北村山公立病院(山形県)、独立行政法人国立病院機構九州がんセンター(福岡県)、国立病院機構 長崎医療センター(長崎県)、広島市立広島市民病院(広島県)、札幌医科大学附属病院(北海道)、群馬県立がんセンター(群馬県)、東北大学病院(宮城県)、日本赤十字社和歌山医療センター(和歌山県)、旭川医科大学病院(北海道)、東京都立駒込病院(東京都)、宮崎県立宮崎病院(宮崎県)、独立行政法人国立病院機構四国がんセンター(愛媛県)、兵庫県立がんセンター(兵庫県)、国立病院機構呉医療センター中国がんセンター(広島県)、熊本大学病院(熊本県)、浜松医療センター(静岡県)、東京医科大学病院(東京都)、山形県立中央病院(山形県)、神戸市立医療センター中央市民病院(兵庫県)、独立行政法人地域医療機能推進機構 下関医療センター(山口県)、小牧市民病院(愛知県)、名古屋市立大学病院(愛知県)、静岡県立総合病院(静岡県)、岡山大学病院(岡山県)、東京医科大学八王子医療センター(東京都)、市立四日市病院(三重県)、国立大学法人岐阜大学医学部附属病院(岐阜県)、佐賀県医療センター好生館(佐賀県)、名古屋大学医学部附属病院(愛知県)、関西電力病院(大阪府)、国立病院機構 北海道がんセンター(北海道)、千葉県がんセンター(千葉県)、岩手医科大学附属病院(岩手県)、大崎市民病院(宮城県)、筑波大学附属病院(茨城県)、福山市民病院(広島県)、日本海総合病院(山形県)、熊本赤十字病院(熊本県)、聖マリアンナ医科大学病院(神奈川県)、JA広島総合病院(広島県)、岐阜市民病院(岐阜県)、伊勢崎市民病院(群馬県)、独立行政法人 国立病院機構 埼玉病院(埼玉県)、順天堂大学医学部附属順天堂医院(東京都) |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs021180026 |
| Publication of results | Published |
| Result | |||||||
| URL related to results and publications | https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(22)00196-6/fulltext | ||||||
| Number of participants that the trial has enrolled | 160 | ||||||
| Results | Median TFS (time-to-failure of strategy) are 8.87 months in the wPTX + BV continued group, and 16.82 months in the maintenance endocrine + BV group, respectively (HR 0.51; p<0.001).
OS (overall survival) in both groups are similar, which means chemo-holiday with endocrine based therapy could be safely applied to ER+HER2-ABC/MBC after induction chemotherapy. HRQoL seems to be better in endocrine + BV compared to chemotherapy continuous strategy. |
||||||
| Results date posted |
|
||||||
| Results Delayed | |||||||
| Results Delay Reason | |||||||
| Date of the first journal publication of results |
|
||||||
| Baseline Characteristics | wPTX + BV continue: 63 Age( mean 56.2 ) Menopause( Pre: 33.3%, Post: 63.5% ) PS( 0:81.0%, 1:19.0% )
endocrine + BV maintenance: 61 Age( mean 56.2 ) Menopause ( Pre:27.9%, Post:70.5% ) PS( 0:91.8%, 1:8.2% ) |
||||||
| Participant flow | Following 4 to 6 cycles of paclitaxel + bevacizumab (wPTX + BV) therapy for ER-positive HER2-negative advanced/recurrent breast cancer (n=160), patients who responded to this therapy were randomized (n=125). 63 cases were in wPTX + BV continuous treatment group, and 62 cases were in endocrine + BV therapy switch group. Except for one unknown record case, all patients had protocol treatment. | ||||||
| Adverse events | The number and rate of major adverse events by group and grades are reported below.
1. All adverse events (1) wPTX+BV therapy (63 patients) All grade:59(93.7%) Grade3:50(79.4%) Grade4:5(7.9%) (2) endocrine + BV therapy (61 patients) All grade:51(83.6%) Grade3:35(57.4%) Grade4:5(8.2%) (3) All (124 patients) All grade:110(88.7%) Grade3:85(68.5%) Grade4:10(8.1%) 2. Hyper tension (1) wPTX+BV therapy (63 patients) All grade:39(61.9%) Grade3:24(38.1%) Grade4:1(1.6%) (2) endocrine + BV therapy (61 patients) All grade:38(62.3%) Grade3:20(32.8%) Grade4:2(3.3%) (3) All (124 patients) All grade:77(62.1%) Grade3:44(35.5%) Grade4:3(2.4%) 3. Decrease in neutrophil count (1) wPTX+BV therapy (63 patients) All grade:33(52.4%) Grade3:16(25.4%) Grade4:2(3.2%) (2) endocrine + BV therapy (61 patients) All grade:26(42.6%) Grade3:10(16.4%) Grade4:2(3.3%) (3) All (124 patients) All grade:59(47.6%) Grade3:26(21.0%) Grade4:4(3.2%) 4. Peripheral neuropathy (1) wPTX+BV therapy (63 patients) All grade:50(79.4%) Grade3:17(27.0%) Grade4:0(0.0%) (2) endocrine + BV therapy (61 patients) All grade:34(55.7%) Grade3:5(8.2%) Grade4:0(0.0%) (3) All (124 patients) All grade:84(67.7%) Grade3:22(17.7%) Grade4:0(0.0%) 5. Proteinuria (1) wPTX+BV therapy (63 patients) All grade:26(41.3%) Grade3:10(15.9%) Grade4:0(0.0%) (2) endocrine + BV therapy (61 patients) All grade:28(45.9%) Grade3:13(21.3%) Grade4:0(0.0%) (3) All (124 patients) All grade:54(43.5%) Grade3:23(18.5%) Grade4:0(0.0%) 6. Bleeding (1) wPTX+BV therapy (63 patients) All grade:19(30.2%) Grade3:0(0.0%) Grade4:0(0.0%) (2) endocrine + BV therapy (61 patients) All grade:24(39.3%) Grade3:0(0.0%) Grade4:0(0.0%) (3) All (124 patients) All grade:43(34.7%) Grade3:0(0.0%) Grade4:0(0.0%) |
||||||
| Outcome measures | (1)Primary endpoint: Time to failure of strategy(TFS)
Median TFS was 8.87 months in the wPTX + continued BV group and 16.82 months in the hormone + BV group. TFS was significantly prolonged in the hormone + BV group (HR 0.51; p<0.001). (2)Secondary endpoint: Overall survival There was no difference in OS between the wPTX + BV continuation group and the hormone + BV group. (3)Secondary endpoint: HRQOL(Health-related QOL) FACT-B-TOI (improvement, deterioration) HRQoL tended to be better in the hormone + BV therapy group compared to the wPTX + BV continuation group at 4 months and 1 year, although not significantly different. |
||||||
| Plan to share IPD | Deidetified patient data will be made available upon reasonable request. | ||||||
| IPD sharing Plan description | |||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Main results already published | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Date of IRB |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry |
|
||||||
| Date trial data considered complete |
|
||||||
| Date analysis concluded | |||||||
| Other | |
| Other related information | |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000014038 |