UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000011771
Receipt number R000013761
Scientific Title Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced CT, Diffusion-weighted MRI and FDG-PET in pleural thickening -Prospective study-
Date of disclosure of the study information 2013/09/16
Last modified on 2013/09/14 17:46:15

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced CT, Diffusion-weighted MRI and FDG-PET in pleural thickening -Prospective study-

Acronym

Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced CT, Diffusion-weighted MRI and FDG-PET in pleural thickening -Prospective study-

Scientific Title

Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced CT, Diffusion-weighted MRI and FDG-PET in pleural thickening -Prospective study-

Scientific Title:Acronym

Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced CT, Diffusion-weighted MRI and FDG-PET in pleural thickening -Prospective study-

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

Mesothelioma

Classification by specialty

Pneumology Chest surgery Radiology

Classification by malignancy

Malignancy

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

The study is conducted with an aim to prospectively examine the usefulness of contrasted CT, diffusion-weighted MRI, and FDG-PET in differentiating diffuse mesothelioma from non-neoplastic pleural thickening such as fibrous pleurisy.

Basic objectives2

Efficacy

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1

Exploratory

Trial characteristics_2

Pragmatic

Developmental phase

Phase IV


Assessment

Primary outcomes

The overall abilities (sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy) to diagnose mesothelioma, disseminated lung cancer, and benign pleural disease (e.g., pleurisy) of various modalities (i.e., contrasted CT, DWI-MRI, and FDG-PET) are compared with those from definite diagnosis.

Key secondary outcomes

•Characteristic appearances are examined for mesothelioma, disseminated lung cancer, and benign pleural disease (pleurisy).
• Diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy) is compared among various modalities (i.e., contrasted CT, DWI-MRI, and FDG-PET).


Base

Study type

Interventional


Study design

Basic design

Single arm

Randomization

Non-randomized

Randomization unit


Blinding

Open -no one is blinded

Control

Uncontrolled

Stratification


Dynamic allocation


Institution consideration


Blocking


Concealment



Intervention

No. of arms

1

Purpose of intervention

Diagnosis

Type of intervention

Medicine Device,equipment

Interventions/Control_1

Patients suspected of having clinical sign of mesothelioma are prospectively enrolled, and these patients will undergo CT-based (plain CT and contrasted CT), MRI-based (T1WI, T2WI, DWI, and contrasted T1WI), and FDG-PET-based examinations in the next 6 weeks.

Interventions/Control_2


Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit

20 years-old <=

Age-upper limit


Not applicable

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

1) Patients who have recurrence pleural fluid of unknown cause and/or pleural thickening of unknown cause, and indefinite diagnosis of malignant tumor lung cancer or mesothelioma by diagnostic imaging and/or thoracentesis.
2) Both inpatients and outpatients
3) Both men and women
4) Patients aged 20 years or older
5) Patients who had been provided with ample explanation before participating in this clinical study, fully understood the content of the study, and submitted a written consent to voluntarily participate in the study

Key exclusion criteria

1) Patients in whom pathological diagnosis was made
2) Patients who underwent invasive treatment
3) Patients for whom the investigator or subinvestigator(s) judges their participation in the clinical trial to be inappropriate
4) Patients in whom MRI examination is contraindicated (e.g., use of a pacemaker)
5) Patients in whom iodine-based and Gd-based contrast media are contraindicated (e.g., patients with a history of hypersensitivity to these contrast media)

Target sample size

100


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name
Middle name
Last name Fumikazu Sakai

Organization

Saitama Medical University International Medical Center

Division name

Department of Diagnostic Radiology

Zip code


Address

1397-1 Yamane Hidaka-shi, Saitama, Japan

TEL

042-984-4520

Email

fmksakai@yahoo.co.jp


Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name
Middle name
Last name Fumikazu Sakai

Organization

Saitama Medical University International Medical Center

Division name

Department of Diagnostic Radiology

Zip code


Address

1397-1 Yamane Hidaka-shi, Saitama, Japan

TEL

042-984-4520

Homepage URL


Email

fmksakai@yahoo.co.jp


Sponsor or person

Institute

Saitama Medical University International Medical Center

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Profit organization

Nationality of Funding Organization

Japan


Other related organizations

Co-sponsor

Japanese Society of Thoracic Radiology

Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization


Address


Tel


Email



Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions

埼玉医科大学国際医療センター(埼玉県)


Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2013 Year 09 Month 16 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol


Publication of results

Unpublished


Result

URL related to results and publications


Number of participants that the trial has enrolled


Results


Results date posted


Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics


Participant flow


Adverse events


Outcome measures


Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Preinitiation

Date of protocol fixation

2013 Year 04 Month 01 Day

Date of IRB


Anticipated trial start date

2013 Year 09 Month 16 Day

Last follow-up date

2018 Year 12 Month 31 Day

Date of closure to data entry


Date trial data considered complete


Date analysis concluded



Other

Other related information



Management information

Registered date

2013 Year 09 Month 14 Day

Last modified on

2013 Year 09 Month 14 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000013761


Research Plan
Registered date File name

Research case data specifications
Registered date File name

Research case data
Registered date File name