| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000010362 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000012122 |
| Scientific Title | Research on standardization of colonoscopy using an ultra-thin instrument |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2013/04/02 |
| Last modified on | 2019/06/13 15:30:28 |
Research on standardization of colonoscopy using an ultra-thin instrument
Colonoscopy using an ultra-thin instrument
Research on standardization of colonoscopy using an ultra-thin instrument
Colonoscopy using an ultra-thin instrument
| Japan |
colorectal disease
| Gastroenterology |
Malignancy
NO
To examin cecal intubation rate, tolerability and adenoma detection rate of colonoscopy using ultra-thin instrument.
Safety,Efficacy
Confirmatory
Explanatory
Phase III
tolerability using numerical rating scale
cecal intubation rate, cecal intubation time, terminal ileum intubation rate, adenoma detection rate
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Single blind -participants are blinded
Active
NO
NO
Institution is not considered as adjustment factor.
NO
Central registration
2
Prevention
| Device,equipment |
standard thin scope
ultra thin scope
| 70 | years-old | <= |
| 90 | years-old | > |
Female
Patients who need to receive colonoscopy
history of colorectal resection
80
| 1st name | Kazutomo |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Togashi |
Fukushima Medical University
Preparatory Office for Aizu Medical Center
329-0434
Aizuwakamatsu, Fukushima
0242-27-2151
togashik@fmu.ac.jp
| 1st name | Kazutomo |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Togashi |
Fukushima Prefectural Aizu General Hospital
Department of Coloproctology
329-0434
Shiromae 10, Aizuwakamatsu
0242-27-2151
togashik@fmu.ac.jp
Fukushima Medical University
Fukushima Medical University
Self funding
Fukushima Medical University
1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima-city
0245471111
rs@fmu.ac.jp
NO
福島県立会津総合病院
| 2013 | Year | 04 | Month | 02 | Day |
Published
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27859645
RESULTS:
There was a significant difference in reported pain using the numerical rating scale (median, UTC 1 vs PDC 4, P < 0.0001). Cecal intubation rates were 97.4% in UTC and 92.1% in PDC (P = 0.36), and ileal intubation rates were 82.0% and 89.4% (P = 0.76), respectively. However, median times to cecum were significantly longer using UTC compared with PDC (15.2 min vs 11.1 min, P = 0.022). Adenoma detection rates were 30.7% in UTC and 26.3% in PDC (P = 0.80).
CONCLUSIONS:
Colonoscopy using UTC was almost equivalent to that of PDC in older female patients, with significantly less pain compared with PDC. UTC may be an alternative to PDC for the difficult colon.
Completed
| 2012 | Year | 08 | Month | 10 | Day |
| 2012 | Year | 08 | Month | 20 | Day |
| 2013 | Year | 10 | Month | 30 | Day |
| 2013 | Year | 12 | Month | 31 | Day |
| 2013 | Year | 12 | Month | 31 | Day |
| 2016 | Year | 12 | Month | 31 | Day |
Dig Endosc. 2016 Nov 10. doi: 10.1111/den.12761. [Epub ahead of print]
| 2013 | Year | 03 | Month | 29 | Day |
| 2019 | Year | 06 | Month | 13 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000012122