| Recruitment status | Enrolling by invitation |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000008169 |
| Receipt No. | R000009619 |
| Official scientific title of the study | Single center randomized control trial of ultra-slim colonoscope with passive bending and high force transmission (PCF-PQ260) versus conventionally used slim colonoscope for unsedated colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2012/06/14 |
| Last modified on | 2018/06/22 (Ver. 10) |
| Basic information | ||
| Official scientific title of the study | Single center randomized control trial of ultra-slim colonoscope with passive bending and high force transmission (PCF-PQ260) versus conventionally used slim colonoscope for unsedated colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. | |
| Title of the study (Brief title) | PCF-PQ260 study for IBD | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | ||
| Condition | Inflammatory Bowel Disease | |
| Classification by specialty |
|
|
| Classification by malignancy | Others | |
| Genomic information | NO | |
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | PCF-PQ260 was developed in order to achieve the facilitation of intubation, and to reduce patient's pain. The aim of this single center randomized control study is to compare the efficacy of the PCF-PQ260 with that of a conventionally used slim colonoscope in unsedated IBD patients undergoing total colonoscopy. |
| Basic objectives2 | Safety,Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | |
| Trial characteristics_2 | |
| Developmental phase | |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | I. Patients rating of procedural pain related to colonoscopy by visual analogue scale |
| Key secondary outcomes | II. The facilitation of intubation
II-1. Completeness of intubation to the cecum II-2. Time required for intubation to the cecum III. Procedural complications in colonoscopy |
| Base | |
| Study type | Interventional |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | Parallel |
| Randomization | Randomized |
| Randomization unit | Individual |
| Blinding | Single blind -participants are blinded |
| Control | Active |
| Stratification | YES |
| Dynamic allocation | NO |
| Institution consideration | |
| Blocking | YES |
| Concealment | Central registration |
| Intervention | ||
| No. of arms | 2 | |
| Purpose of intervention | Prevention | |
| Type of intervention |
|
|
| Interventions/Control_1 | II.Intervened group: Patients who are randomly assigned to receive total colonoscopy with PCF-PQ260. Intervention is at the day when patients are examined by total colonoscopy. | |
| Interventions/Control_2 | II.Control group: Patients who are randomlyassigned to receive total colonoscopy with conventionally used slim colonoscope (PCF-Q260A).
Intervention is at the day when patients are examined by total colonoscopy. |
|
| Interventions/Control_3 | ||
| Interventions/Control_4 | ||
| Interventions/Control_5 | ||
| Interventions/Control_6 | ||
| Interventions/Control_7 | ||
| Interventions/Control_8 | ||
| Interventions/Control_9 | ||
| Interventions/Control_10 | ||
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | I.IBD patients undergoing an elective, diagnostic, or screening colonoscopy at Hyogo college of Medicine Hospital are prospectively included.
II.Patients who had a diagnosis of IBD before colonoscopy III.Patient was able to provide written informed consent to total colonoscopy basically without sedation and being randomized to the new ultrathin flexible scope (PCF-PQ260) group or to the conventional scope (PCF-Q260A) group. IV.Patients aged 18 or older. |
|||
| Key exclusion criteria | I.Cases of the short bowel syndrome.
II.Cases that have obvious bleeding from intestine and possibility of perforation. III.Cases of the megacolon or toxic megacolon. IV.Cases that have severe stenosis or adhesion. V.Cases that have severe inflammation and high risk for colonoscopy. VI.Patients could not provide consent or when patients preferred to receive sedation/analgesia from the start. VII.Patient had undergone prior partial colonic resection VIII.Cases whose preparation was incomplete before colonoscopy |
|||
| Target sample size | 120 | |||
| Research contact person | |
| Name of lead principal investigator | Shiro Nakamura, MD. Ph.D. |
| Organization | Hyogo College of Medicine |
| Division name | Dept.of Internal medicine, Lower gastroenterology |
| Address | 1-1 Mukogawa, Nishinomiya, Hyogo 663-8501 |
| TEL | 0798-45-6662 |
| shiro@hyo-med.ac.jp | |
| Public contact | |
| Name of contact person | Yoshio Ohda MD.Ph.D. |
| Organization | Hyogo College of Medicine |
| Division name | Dept.of Internal medicine, Lower gastroenterology |
| Address | 1-1 Mukogawa, Nishinomiya, Hyogo 663-8501 |
| TEL | 0798-45-6662 |
| Homepage URL | |
| y-ohda@hyo-med.ac.jp | |
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Hyogo College of Medicine, Dept. of Internal medicine, Lower gastroenterology |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | None |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Self funding |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | 兵庫医科大学病院 |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Enrolling by invitation | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry |
|
||||||
| Date trial data considered complete |
|
||||||
| Date analysis concluded |
|
||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | |
| Publication of results | Partially published |
| URL releasing results | https://www.ecco-ibd.eu/publications/congress-abstract-s/item/ |
| Results | The UC patient demographic characteristics were similar between these two study arms(one arm n=42). There were no significant differences in the cecal intubation rate(97.6%)and time (4min)between the new type scope group and the conventional type scope group.
However,the VAS score was significantly lower in the new type scope group than the conventional type scope group. |
| Other related information | 1)The subjects of this study became 156 people(UC107, CD49)in total.
2)We added the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the patients. 3)We set the main outcome end-point of the evaluation only the painful degree of subjects. Because VAS and Face rating scale were things of the same contents, we decided to evaluate it only in VAS. Also,we set time required for intubation to the cecum and completeness of intubation to the cecum and procedural complications in colonoscopy as secondary outcome. |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/icdr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000009619 |