| Recruitment status | Completed |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000008048 |
| Receipt No. | R000009477 |
| Official scientific title of the study | Assessment of Still and Moving Images in the Diagnosis of Gastric Lesions Using Magnifying Narrow-Band Imaging in a Multicenter Trial |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2012/06/01 |
| Last modified on | 2016/09/22 (Ver. 8) |
| Basic information | ||
| Official scientific title of the study | Assessment of Still and Moving Images in the Diagnosis of Gastric Lesions Using Magnifying Narrow-Band Imaging in a Multicenter Trial | |
| Title of the study (Brief title) | NBI-SM Study | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | ||
| Condition | gastric cancer | |
| Classification by specialty |
|
|
| Classification by malignancy | Malignancy | |
| Genomic information | NO | |
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | Magnifying narrow-band imaging (M-NBI) is a useful diagnostic tool for distinguishing between early gastric cancer and non-cancerous lesions. In a recent multicenter, randomized, controlled study, M-NBI including moving images was shown to be more accurate than white-light imaging for diagnosing depressed small gastric mucosal cancers. However, the efficacy of M-NBI with moving images for diagnosing gastric lesions is still uncertain. In this study, we compared the diagnostic accuracy of M-NBI with still images only with that of M-NBI with both still and moving images, and tried to identify the additional benefits of moving images in terms of diagnostic accuracy. |
| Basic objectives2 | Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | |
| Trial characteristics_2 | |
| Developmental phase | |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | difference in the accuracy of diagnosis of cancerous versus non-cancerous lesions between the still image test and the moving image test |
| Key secondary outcomes | subgroup analysis of the characteristics of the participants, including whether or not they were board-certified by the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, and their relative experience with the M-NBI procedure |
| Base | |
| Study type | Interventional |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | Single arm |
| Randomization | Non-randomized |
| Randomization unit | |
| Blinding | Open -no one is blinded |
| Control | Historical |
| Stratification | |
| Dynamic allocation | |
| Institution consideration | |
| Blocking | |
| Concealment | |
| Intervention | |||
| No. of arms | 1 | ||
| Purpose of intervention | Diagnosis | ||
| Type of intervention |
|
||
| Interventions/Control_1 | Each study participant was first tested using the still images only (still image test), and then tested a month later using both the still and moving images (moving image test). | ||
| Interventions/Control_2 | |||
| Interventions/Control_3 | |||
| Interventions/Control_4 | |||
| Interventions/Control_5 | |||
| Interventions/Control_6 | |||
| Interventions/Control_7 | |||
| Interventions/Control_8 | |||
| Interventions/Control_9 | |||
| Interventions/Control_10 | |||
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | participating doctors will not be limited. | |||
| Key exclusion criteria | nothing. | |||
| Target sample size | 34 | |||
| Research contact person | |
| Name of lead principal investigator | Hisashi Doyama |
| Organization | Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital |
| Division name | Department of Gastroenterology |
| Address | Kuratsukihigashi 2-1, Kanazawa city, Ishikawa Prefecture |
| TEL | 076-237-8211 |
| doyama.134@ipch.jp | |
| Public contact | |
| Name of contact person | Tomoyuki Hayashi |
| Organization | Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital |
| Division name | Department of Gastroenterology |
| Address | Kuratsukihigashi 2-1, Kanazawa city, Ishikawa Prefecture |
| TEL | 076-237-8211 |
| Homepage URL | |
| hayasix0917@gmail.com | |
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Department of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | No |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Other |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Completed | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry |
|
||||||
| Date trial data considered complete |
|
||||||
| Date analysis concluded |
|
||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0100857 |
| Publication of results | Published |
| URL releasing results | http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0100857 |
| Results | There was no significant difference in the rate of accurate diagnosis of cancerous versus non-cancerous lesions between the still image and the moving image tests (59.9% versus 61.4%). However, the diagnostic accuracy were significantly lower in the still image test than the moving image test in the subgroup of board-certified endoscopists (62.5% versus 66.5%, p=0.04), the subgroup of endoscopists who had experienced more than 200 M-NBI procedures (65.6% versus 68.9%, p<0.05), and the subgroup of endoscopists who had experienced more than 15 M-NBI procedures in the previous month (65.1% versus 69.3%, p=0.04). |
| Other related information | |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000009477 |