Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000006754 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000007986 |
Scientific Title | Comparative study of tunneling bloc biopsy versus EUS-fine needle aspiration for GI subepithelial tumor (a prospective comparative study in the same case) |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2011/11/23 |
Last modified on | 2016/11/24 12:59:35 |
Comparative study of tunneling bloc biopsy versus EUS-fine needle aspiration for GI subepithelial tumor
(a prospective comparative study in the same case)
Tunneling bloc biopsy for GI subepithelial tumor
Comparative study of tunneling bloc biopsy versus EUS-fine needle aspiration for GI subepithelial tumor
(a prospective comparative study in the same case)
Tunneling bloc biopsy for GI subepithelial tumor
Japan |
Gastrointestinal submucosal tumor
Gastroenterology | Hematology and clinical oncology |
Malignancy
NO
To examine the usefulness and safety of a new biopsy method for SMT
Safety,Efficacy
Immunohistological diagnostic ratio
complication rate
technical success rate
procedure time
biopsy frequency
Interventional
Cross-over
Non-randomized
Open -no one is blinded
Active
2
Diagnosis
Maneuver |
tunneling bloc biopsy
EUS-FNAB
20 | years-old | <= |
90 | years-old | >= |
Male and Female
Cases of tumor protruding in submucosa by EUS and CT imagings
extraluminal tumor
50
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Hideki Kobara |
Kagawa Medical University
Department of Gastroenterology and Neurology
1750-1 Ikenobe, Miki-cho, Kita-gun, Kagawa 761-0793 Japan.
087-891-2156
kobara@med.kagawa-u.ac.jp
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Hideki Kobara |
Kagawa Medical University
Department of Gastroenterology and Neurology
1750-1 Ikenobe, Miki, Kita, Kagawa 761-0793, Japan
087-891-2156
kobara@med.kagawa-u.ac.jp
Kagawa Medical University
Kagawa Medical University
Self funding
NO
2011 | Year | 11 | Month | 23 | Day |
Unpublished
The study was a non-randomized, prospective comparative study with crossover design in patients with endoluminal gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs). Forty-three patients, including 29 cases with lesions <2 cm were enrolled. A crossover design with two intervention phases (Group A: EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) followed by STB for 23 SELs, Group B: STB followed by FNA for 20 SELs) was implemented. The primary outcome was the diagnostic yield (DY). Secondary outcomes were technical success rate, procedure time, complication rate, and sample quality.
Results: The DY of STB was significantly higher than that of FNA (100% vs. 34.8%) in group A, including 100% in overall STB. The technical success rate of STB was significantly higher than that of FNA (100% vs. 56.5%), whereas the median procedure time of STB was significantly longer than that of FNA (37 minutes vs. 18 minutes). The median specimen area of STB samples was markedly larger than that of FNA samples (5.54 mm2 vs. 0.69 mm2). No complications occurred in either method.
Conclusions: STB had significantly superior diagnostic ability and a more adequate sample quality than FNA for endoluminal gastric SELs, indicating the suitability of STB for small SELs.
Completed
2011 | Year | 11 | Month | 01 | Day |
2011 | Year | 11 | Month | 07 | Day |
2016 | Year | 10 | Month | 01 | Day |
2016 | Year | 10 | Month | 20 | Day |
2016 | Year | 10 | Month | 25 | Day |
2016 | Year | 10 | Month | 31 | Day |
2011 | Year | 11 | Month | 21 | Day |
2016 | Year | 11 | Month | 24 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000007986