UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000006644
Receipt number R000007858
Scientific Title A case-matched comparison of single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer
Date of disclosure of the study information 2011/11/01
Last modified on 2011/11/01 15:23:19

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

A case-matched comparison of single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer

Acronym

A case-matched comparison of single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic colectomy

Scientific Title

A case-matched comparison of single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer

Scientific Title:Acronym

A case-matched comparison of single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic colectomy

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

colon cancer

Classification by specialty

Gastrointestinal surgery

Classification by malignancy

Malignancy

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

To compare short-term clinicopathological and financial outcomes between single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy (SILC) and multiport laparoscopic right colectomy (LAC) for right colon cancer.

Basic objectives2

Safety,Efficacy

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1


Trial characteristics_2


Developmental phase



Assessment

Primary outcomes

The clinicopathological findings and financial outcomes were then analyzed between the two groups.

Key secondary outcomes



Base

Study type

Observational


Study design

Basic design


Randomization


Randomization unit


Blinding


Control


Stratification


Dynamic allocation


Institution consideration


Blocking


Concealment



Intervention

No. of arms


Purpose of intervention


Type of intervention


Interventions/Control_1


Interventions/Control_2


Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit

40 years-old <=

Age-upper limit

90 years-old >=

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

Right colon cancer

Key exclusion criteria

Colonic obstruction, perforation, remote metastasis, bulky mesenteric lymph nodes near the tumor, and involvement of the abdominal wall

Target sample size

35


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name
Middle name
Last name On Suzuki

Organization

Teine-Keijinkai Hospital

Division name

Department of Surgery

Zip code


Address

1-jo, 12-chome, Maeda, Teine-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido

TEL

+81-11-681-8111

Email



Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name
Middle name
Last name

Organization

Teine-Keijinkai Hospital

Division name

Department of Surgery

Zip code


Address


TEL


Homepage URL


Email

onsuzuki@tkeijinkai.gr.jp


Sponsor or person

Institute

Teine-Keijinkai Hospital

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

None

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Other

Nationality of Funding Organization



Other related organizations

Co-sponsor


Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization


Address


Tel


Email



Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions



Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2011 Year 11 Month 01 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol


Publication of results

Unpublished


Result

URL related to results and publications


Number of participants that the trial has enrolled


Results


Results date posted


Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics


Participant flow


Adverse events


Outcome measures


Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Enrolling by invitation

Date of protocol fixation

2011 Year 11 Month 01 Day

Date of IRB


Anticipated trial start date

2011 Year 11 Month 01 Day

Last follow-up date


Date of closure to data entry


Date trial data considered complete


Date analysis concluded



Other

Other related information

Operative time was not significantly different in SILC compared with LAC. SILC patients, however, had a significantly earlier return of bowel movement, decreased scores for maximal pain assessed by a visual analogue scale on post-operative day 1, fewer usages of postoperative systemic narcotics, and shorter length of stay. Postoperative morbidity and blood test results were similar between the groups. Neither mortality nor 30-day readmission occurred in either group. Oncologic findings did not reach a significant difference between them. Although no significant difference in the costs of disposable instruments existed between the two groups, the total costs were significantly less in the SILC group.


Management information

Registered date

2011 Year 11 Month 01 Day

Last modified on

2011 Year 11 Month 01 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000007858