UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Recruitment status Terminated
Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000005613
Receipt No. R000006632
Official scientific title of the study Clinical PhII Study: Investigation for safety and efficacy of bendamustine and rituximab, B-R combination therapy for the patients of recurrent and/or refractory low-grade B cell lymphoma or mantle cell lymphoma previously treated with one or two regimen including rituximab
Date of disclosure of the study information 2011/05/20
Last modified on 2016/05/07 (Ver. 21)

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information
Official scientific title of the study Clinical PhII Study: Investigation for safety and efficacy of bendamustine and rituximab, B-R combination therapy for the patients of recurrent and/or refractory low-grade B cell lymphoma or mantle cell lymphoma previously treated with one or two regimen including rituximab
Title of the study (Brief title) BRB Study
Region
Japan

Condition
Condition Relapsed and/or refractory low-grade B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Classification by specialty
Hematology and clinical oncology
Classification by malignancy Malignancy
Genomic information NO

Objectives
Narrative objectives1 To investigate for safety and efficacy of bendamustine and rituximab, B-R combination therapy up to 4 cycles for the patients of reccurent and/or refractory low-grade B cell lymphoma previously treated
Basic objectives2 Safety,Efficacy
Basic objectives -Others
Trial characteristics_1 Confirmatory
Trial characteristics_2
Developmental phase Phase II

Assessment
Primary outcomes Overall response rate (best response)
Key secondary outcomes Adverse events
Complete response rate
TTP
OS
HT rate
SPM rate

In outcomes field, the entry of just a few words such as "safety" or "efficiency" will not be accepted. Specify the name of outcome measures, including the time when you plan to measure. Usually, only one primary outcome is accepted. Write the other outcomes in "secondary outcomes" field.

Base
Study type Interventional

Study design
Basic design Single arm
Randomization Non-randomized
Randomization unit
Blinding Open -no one is blinded
Control Uncontrolled
Stratification
Dynamic allocation
Institution consideration
Blocking
Concealment

Intervention
No. of arms 1
Purpose of intervention Treatment
Type of intervention
Medicine
Interventions/Control_1 1st cycle; Administrate Rituximab 375mg/m2 DIV for d1 and Bendamustine 90 mg/m2 DIV for d 2 and d 3 and observe for 25 ds.
2nd to 4th cycle; Rituximab 375mg/m2 DIV d1 and Bendamustine 90 mg/m2 DIV d1 and d2 and observe for 26 ds.
Interventions/Control_2
Interventions/Control_3
Interventions/Control_4
Interventions/Control_5
Interventions/Control_6
Interventions/Control_7
Interventions/Control_8
Interventions/Control_9
Interventions/Control_10

In interventions field, include the details of interventions, such as duration, amount, and frequency. If the intervention includes prescription or use of medical devices, duration is required.

Eligibility
Age-lower limit
20 years-old <=
Age-upper limit
80 years-old >
Gender Male and Female
Key inclusion criteria 1. Low-grade B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma pts confirmed with histology or cytology
2. Pt who were previously treated with 1 or 2 regimen including rituximab
3. Refractory or recurrent disease pts
4. CD20 positive
5. Mesureable disease
6. ECOG performance status 0-2
7. ANC=1500 or more, Hb=9.0 or more, Platelet count=100000 or more, AST, ALT, and ALP less than 2.5XUL, TB and Cr less than 1.5XUL
8. Normal ECG or asymptomatic minor ECG change
9. Expected surviaval time more than 3 M
10.Written informed consent obtained
Key exclusion criteria 1. Pregnancy, brest-feedings, or pts who would be pregnant
2. Active double cancer
3. Psychotics judged could not be difficutlt to attend
4. Severe complication and/or infection
5. Liver cirrhosis
6. Interstitial pneumonitis
7. Tumor cells in PB are 25000/uL or more
8. CNS invasion
9. Past history of bendamustine administration
10.Inappropriate to administer rituximab
11.Sever hypersensitity on any agents
12.Judged to be inappropriate
Target sample size 44

Research contact person
Name of lead principal investigator Shinichiro Okamoto
Organization Keio University, School of Medicine
Division name Division of Hematology
Address Shinanomachi 35, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
TEL 03-3353-1211
Email okamoto@a7.keio.jp

Public contact
Name of contact person Kimihiro Matsumoto
Organization Keio University School of Medicine, Division of Hematology
Division name Hematology
Address Shinanomachi 35, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
TEL 03-3353-1211
Homepage URL
Email kmatumoto1123@gmail.com

Sponsor
Institute Keio BRB Study group
Institute
Department

Sponsor means an organization that is responsible for plan, deployment and
report of the research including funding management. It doesn't mean
funding agency". Therefore, all clinical trial should have the one.

Funding Source
Organization Self funding
Organization
Division
Category of Funding Organization Self funding
Nationality of Funding Organization

Other related organizations
Co-sponsor
Name of secondary funder(s)

Secondary IDs
Secondary IDs NO
Study ID_1
Org. issuing International ID_1
Study ID_2
Org. issuing International ID_2
IND to MHLW

Institutions
Institutions 慶應義塾大学病院(東京都)、杏林大学病院(東京都)、横浜市立市民病院(神奈川県)、東京医療センター(東京都)、永寿総合病院(東京都)、済生会中央病院(東京都)、川崎市立川崎病院(神奈川県)、東京歯科大学市川総合病院(千葉県)、けいゆう病院(神奈川県)、済生会宇都宮病院(栃木県)、立川病院(東京都)、東京電力病院(東京都)

Other administrative information
Date of disclosure of the study information
2011 Year 05 Month 20 Day

Progress
Recruitment status Terminated
Date of protocol fixation
2011 Year 04 Month 05 Day
Anticipated trial start date
2011 Year 05 Month 01 Day
Last follow-up date
2016 Year 03 Month 31 Day
Date of closure to data entry
Date trial data considered complete
2016 Year 03 Month 31 Day
Date analysis concluded
2016 Year 12 Month 31 Day

Related information
URL releasing protocol
Publication of results Partially published
URL releasing results http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12185-015-1767-3
Results Fifty-three patients were enrolled in this study and analyzed. The diagnosis included follicular lymphoma (FL) (77 %), mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (13 %) and others (10 %). Forty-seven (90 %) patients completed four cycles of treatment as per schedule. Best overall response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR) was 94 and 71 %, respectively (for FL, ORR 95 % and CRR 80 %). The treatment was well tolerated and the primary toxicity was myelosuppression; the incidence of grade 3/4 leukopenia and neutropenia were 42 and 40 %, respectively. There were no grade 5 toxicities. For the evaluation of late toxicity, especially infection, longer follow-up of this cohort is needed.
Other related information

Management information
Registered date
2011 Year 05 Month 17 Day
Last modified on
2016 Year 05 Month 07 Day


Link to view the page
URL(English) https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000006632