| Recruitment status | Completed |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000005574 |
| Receipt No. | R000006597 |
| Official scientific title of the study | The association between fall, motor vehicle collisions and primary open-angle glaucoma |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2011/05/09 |
| Last modified on | 2016/06/14 (Ver. 6) |
| Basic information | ||
| Official scientific title of the study | The association between fall, motor vehicle collisions and primary open-angle glaucoma | |
| Title of the study (Brief title) | The association between fall, motor vehicle collisions and primary open-angle glaucoma | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | ||
| Condition | Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma | |
| Classification by specialty |
|
|
| Classification by malignancy | Others | |
| Genomic information | NO | |
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | To investigate and compare the incidence of motor vehicle collisions and falls involving individuals with or without primary open-angle glaucoma. |
| Basic objectives2 | Others |
| Basic objectives -Others | To investigate and compare the incidence of motor vehicle collisions and falls involving individuals with or without primary open-angle glaucoma. |
| Trial characteristics_1 | |
| Trial characteristics_2 | |
| Developmental phase | |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | The incidence of falls and motor vehicle collisions |
| Key secondary outcomes | |
| In outcomes field, the entry of just a few words such as "safety" or "efficiency" will not be accepted. Specify the name of outcome measures, including the time when you plan to measure. Usually, only one primary outcome is accepted. Write the other outcomes in "secondary outcomes" field. |
| Base | |
| Study type | Observational |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | |
| Randomization | |
| Randomization unit | |
| Blinding | |
| Control | |
| Stratification | |
| Dynamic allocation | |
| Institution consideration | |
| Blocking | |
| Concealment | |
| Intervention | |
| No. of arms | |
| Purpose of intervention | |
| Type of intervention | |
| Interventions/Control_1 | |
| Interventions/Control_2 | |
| Interventions/Control_3 | |
| Interventions/Control_4 | |
| Interventions/Control_5 | |
| Interventions/Control_6 | |
| Interventions/Control_7 | |
| Interventions/Control_8 | |
| Interventions/Control_9 | |
| Interventions/Control_10 | |
| In interventions field, include the details of interventions, such as duration, amount, and frequency. If the intervention includes prescription or use of medical devices, duration is required. |
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | Subjects were screened for eligibility by means of an ophthalmic examination that included slit-lamp biomicroscopy, funduscopy, gonioscopy, intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry, and visual field examination with a static visual field analyzer using the 30-2 Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm Standard Strategy (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) when necessary.
POAG was diagnosed on the basis of the presence of the following 3 findings: (1) glaucomatous optic cupping represented by notch formation, generalized enlargement of cupping, senile sclerotic disc or myopic disc, or nerve fiber layer defects; (2) typical glaucomatous visual field defects such as Bjerrum scotoma, nasal step, or paracentral scotoma compatible with optic disc appearance; and (3) open and not occludable angle observed on gonioscopy. All patients with POAG underwent a visual field examination to assess POAG severity. For the purposes of this study, we defined mild POAG as a visual field defect corresponding to a mean deviation (MD) of -6 dB or better in both eyes, moderate POAG as corresponding to a MD of -6 to -12 dB in the worse eye, and severe POAG as a MD of -12 dB or worse in the worse eye. |
|||
| Key exclusion criteria | Subjects with fundus disease such as age-related macular degeneration, prpriferative diabetic retinopathy, or any fundus diease.
Subjects who is unable to take informed consent. Subjects who cannot walk without help. |
|||
| Target sample size | 800 | |||
| Research contact person | |
| Name of lead principal investigator | Kenya Yuki |
| Organization | Keio University School of Medicine |
| Division name | Department of Ophthalmology |
| Address | Shinanomachi 35,Shinjyuku-ku |
| TEL | |
| Public contact | |
| Name of contact person | |
| Organization | Keio University School of Medicine |
| Division name | Depaertment of Ophthalmology |
| Address | Shinanomachi 35,Shinjyuku-ku |
| TEL | |
| Homepage URL | |
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Keio University School of Medicine,Department of Ophthalmology |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Sponsor means an organization that is responsible for plan, deployment and report of the research including funding management. It doesn't mean funding agency". Therefore, all clinical trial should have the one. |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | self funding |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Self funding |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Completed | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry |
|
||||||
| Date trial data considered complete | |||||||
| Date analysis concluded | |||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | |
| Publication of results | Partially published |
| URL releasing results | |
| Results | |
| Other related information | This study is a cross-sectional and prospective cohort study. All participants were requested to answer a questionnaire that elicited information on,in breif whether they had been involved in one or more MVCs over the past five years while driving, whether they had fallen once or more over the past one years; current daily driving habits, number of years since acquisition of first driving license, current illnesses and medical history, and demographic characteristics, age, sex. Patients were excluded from the study if they had never held a driver license, and or they had any mental disease. These data were compared between control and POAG group. Same questionnaire were followed annually by mail of telephone for five years. |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/icdr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000006597 |