Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000004912 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000005849 |
Scientific Title | Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) and conventional imaging of Breast Carcinoma. |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2011/01/22 |
Last modified on | 2011/01/20 14:38:16 |
Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) and conventional imaging of Breast Carcinoma.
Evaluation of Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography
Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) and conventional imaging of Breast Carcinoma.
Evaluation of Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography
Japan |
Participants in this study will be adult female who fulfills the following four criteria:
1. Examined by mammography or ultrasound this past year, and was diagnosed as ACR category 3.
2. Diagnosed as CESM applicant by research investigator or sub investigator, having interview, clinical breast examination, and other examinations.
3. Adult female over 20 years old
4. Signed a consent form to participate this clinical study
Breast surgery |
Malignancy
NO
These women had lesions that were initially depicted at plain mammography (PM) or ultrasound (US) and that were suspected of being malignant . The patients are separated into two categories.
Group A: Depicted at US
Group B: only by PM. The purpose study is to investigate the following:
1. To investigate the potential of CESM and compare with PM for A) Category
1.1 Sensitivity
Sensitivity CESM vs. PM
1.2 Characterization
Classified as BI-RADS categories defined by ACR both for PM, CESM images. Then make a definitive diagnosis by Pathology assessment. Finally evaluate the efficiency for CESM by ROC.
2. To investigate the potential of CESM compare with PM for B) Category
2.1 Sensitivity
Equivalence trial PM and CESM
2.2 Characterization
Evaluate the accuracy for CESM by ROC.
3. Confirm the adverse event for CESM
Efficacy
1.Primary Endpoint
Evaluate the sensitivity of CESM
2. Secondary endpoint
Evaluate characteristics and adverse events of CESM
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Open -no one is blinded
Active
2
Prevention
Medicine | Device,equipment |
30 cases for both group A
Duration of study:
January 2011 to June 30
Contrast agent:
Nonionic solution containing
350 mg of iodine per milliliter
X-ray: radiology exposure less than 0.2mSv
30 cases for both group B
Duration of study:
January 2011 to June 30
Contrast agent:
Nonionic solution containing
350 mg of iodine per milliliter
X-ray: radiology exposure less than 0.2mSv
20 | years-old | <= |
Not applicable |
Female
Objective of participant selection is to satisfy following selection criteria and not conflict with exclusion criteria.
Criteria for selecting participants: Adult female who visit research laboratories to be diagnosed breast cancer
using diagnostic imaging, and fulfill following criteria;
1.Conducted PM and/or US this past year and diagnosed as ACR category 3
2.Diagnosed as CESM applicant by research investigator or sub investigator's interview, clinical breast examination, and other examinations.
3.Adult female over 20 years old.
Signed a consent form to participate this clinical study
Exclude patients who meet the following criteria
1 Complications and/or preexisting disorders of respiratory disease, such as asthma,chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary cancer, and interstitial pneumonia.
2 Preexisting disorders of being allergic to iodinated contrast material and iodine-containing drug medicine, complications and/or preexisiting disorders of allergists, such as drug allegy and alimentary allergy.
3 Complications and/or preexisting disorders of the thyroid gland
4 Diabetes drug (metformin) and is not able to take sufficient drug holidays brfore and affer the study (Over 48 hours for bot before and after the study)
5 Patient whose general condition is significantly disordered or has complocations and/or preexisiting disorders of critical cerebropathy, such as hematencephalon and stroke, liver disease, such as hepatic cirrhosis and hpatic failure, kidney disease, such as glomerulonephritis and patient who requiring dialysis.
6 Complications of acute pancreatitis, Waldenstorm's macroglobulinemia multiple myeloma, tetany, and pheochromocytoma.
7 Patinet who performed breast enlargement sturgery including saline-filled and silicone-gel-filled implants.
8 Patient who is diagnosed as mental disorders including moderate or severe dementia and identified by attending physician that she neither fully comprehend nor cooperate.
9 Pregnant women or breast-feeding women.
10.Who is participating or has participanter clinical research study and/or past marketing surveillance for last three months period.
11 Others;attending physician has cancers for a patient to join this clinical study and/or for a patient to be a hinder of evaluation the result.
Reasons of creating exclusion criteria are as follows
1,2,3,4,5,6; contraindicated disease of iodinated contrast materials
7;affecting the risk for interpretation of radiogram
8,9,10,11;general considerations of clinical study
60
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Mitsuhiro Mizutani |
Mikawa Breast cancer clinic
Breast surgeon, director
39-6,hida,shinome-cho,anjyou-shi,Aichi-ken
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name |
CESM society
secretariat
39-6,hida,shinome-cho,anjyo-shi,Aichi-ken
+81-566-77-5211
CESM society
NA
Self funding
NO
2011 | Year | 01 | Month | 22 | Day |
Unpublished
Open public recruiting
2011 | Year | 01 | Month | 20 | Day |
2011 | Year | 01 | Month | 01 | Day |
2011 | Year | 01 | Month | 20 | Day |
2011 | Year | 01 | Month | 20 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000005849