| Recruitment status | Completed |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000004011 |
| Receipt No. | R000004820 |
| Scientific Title | Multicenter Phase II sequential study of S-1/Oxaliplatin (SOX) and Bevacizumab as first line therapy followed by S-1/Irinotecan (IRIS) and Cetuximab as second line in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. : A SOBIC study |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2010/08/20 |
| Last modified on | 2020/08/17 (Ver. 6) |
| Basic information | ||
| Public title | Multicenter Phase II sequential study of S-1/Oxaliplatin (SOX) and Bevacizumab as first line therapy followed by S-1/Irinotecan (IRIS) and Cetuximab as second line in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. : A SOBIC study | |
| Acronym | SOBIC study | |
| Scientific Title | Multicenter Phase II sequential study of S-1/Oxaliplatin (SOX) and Bevacizumab as first line therapy followed by S-1/Irinotecan (IRIS) and Cetuximab as second line in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. : A SOBIC study | |
| Scientific Title:Acronym | SOBIC study | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | ||||
| Condition | Metastatic Colorectal Cancer | |||
| Classification by specialty |
|
|||
| Classification by malignancy | Malignancy | |||
| Genomic information | YES | |||
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | To evaluate the efficacy and safety of SOX plus bevacizumab as first line therapy followed by IRIS plus cetuximab ( K-ras mutations : IRIS plus bevacizumab or IRIS ) in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. |
| Basic objectives2 | Safety,Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | Exploratory |
| Trial characteristics_2 | Pragmatic |
| Developmental phase | Phase II |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | Second PFS (progression-free survival) |
| Key secondary outcomes | Receive rate of second line therapy, Overall survival, rate of KRAS mutation / wild type.
Each evaluation of the first and second line respectively: response rate (RR), PFS, conversion rate of nonresectable to resectable and R0 resection ratio (R0-R), safety profile. |
| Base | |
| Study type | Interventional |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | Single arm |
| Randomization | Non-randomized |
| Randomization unit | |
| Blinding | Open -no one is blinded |
| Control | Uncontrolled |
| Stratification | |
| Dynamic allocation | |
| Institution consideration | |
| Blocking | |
| Concealment | |
| Intervention | ||
| No. of arms | 1 | |
| Purpose of intervention | Treatment | |
| Type of intervention |
|
|
| Interventions/Control_1 | 1st line
SOX+BV 2nd line IRIS+Cmab IRIS+Bmab IRIS |
|
| Interventions/Control_2 | ||
| Interventions/Control_3 | ||
| Interventions/Control_4 | ||
| Interventions/Control_5 | ||
| Interventions/Control_6 | ||
| Interventions/Control_7 | ||
| Interventions/Control_8 | ||
| Interventions/Control_9 | ||
| Interventions/Control_10 | ||
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | (1)Patients with histologically proven colorectal cancer
(2)Unresectable or recurrent colorectal camcer (3)Age >= 20 and =< 80 (4) ECOG performance status of 0,1. (5) Unresectable primary tumor or with one or more unresectable metatatic tumor Measurable or evaluable disease (measurable lesions in RECIST criteria is unnecessary) within 30 days before registration. (6)No prior chemotherapy or first recurrence with no chemotherapy for recurrent lesion.(without receiving adjuvant chemotherapy by 5FU only) (7)Ability of oral intake (8) Adequate function of vital organs, including normal hematopoietic function, normal liver function and normal renal function as evidenced by the following data within two weeks before registration |
|||
| Key exclusion criteria | (1) History of the serious hypersensitivity for Fluorouracil, oxaliplatin or bevacizumab
(2) Pregnant or lactating women or women of childbearing potential. (3) Severe infectious disease (4) Serious complication (e.g. interstitialpneumonia, or pulmonary fibrosis, kidney injury, hepatic failure, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, uncontrolled hypertension) (5) Comorbidity or history of heart failure (6) Peptic ulcers (7) Severe dysesthesia or sensory abnormality with functional disorder (8) Severe diarrhea (9) Massive pleural effusion or ascites. (10) Obstruction or disorder on digestive tract due to peritoneal metastasis |
|||
| Target sample size | 48 | |||
| Research contact person | |||||||
| Name of lead principal investigator |
|
||||||
| Organization | Hyogo College of Medicine | ||||||
| Division name | Department of Surgery | ||||||
| Zip code | 663-8501 | ||||||
| Address | 1-1, Mukogawa-Cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo | ||||||
| TEL | 0798-45-6370 | ||||||
| ntomita@hyo-med.ac.jp | |||||||
| Public contact | |||||||
| Name of contact person |
|
||||||
| Organization | Hyogo College of Medicine | ||||||
| Division name | Department of Surgery | ||||||
| Zip code | 663-8501 | ||||||
| Address | 1-1, Mukogawa-Cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo | ||||||
| TEL | 0798-45-6370 | ||||||
| Homepage URL | |||||||
| ntomita@hyo-med.ac.jp | |||||||
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Hyogo Colorectal Cancer Study Group |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | None |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Self funding |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| IRB Contact (For public release) | |
| Organization | Hyogo College of Medicine |
| Address | 1-1, Mukogawa-cho, Nishinomiya-city, Hyogo |
| Tel | 0798-45-6370 |
| ntomita@hyo-med.ac.jp | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | none |
| Publication of results | Published |
| Result | |||||||
| URL related to results and publications | International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25(7), 1285-1290 | ||||||
| Number of participants that the trial has enrolled | 52 | ||||||
| Results | The median second progression-free survival was 24.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.7 35.2). The response rate after first- and second-line chemotherapy was 46.7% and 20%, respectively. The median overall survival was 35.2 months (95% CI: 27.8 to not reached). The main grade 3,4 adverse events were sensory neuropathy (18%), fatigue (10%), and anorexia (8%). There were no treatment-related deaths among patients administered the first-line and second-line regimens. |
||||||
| Results date posted |
|
||||||
| Results Delayed | |||||||
| Results Delay Reason | |||||||
| Date of the first journal publication of results |
|
||||||
| Baseline Characteristics | Total No. of patients : 50 Gender : male 30 / female 20 Median age : 65 (35-77) Tumor location : colon 30 / rectum 20 Complication : + 9 / - 39 / unknown 2 KRAS staus : mutaion 20 / wild 20 / unknown 10 |
||||||
| Participant flow | From May 2010 through March 2013, 52 patients from 10 institutions in the HCCSG were enrolled. Two patients, 1 who withdrew consent and 1 with no measurable lesion, were excluded from analysis. This, 50 patients were included in the efficacy analysis. All these 50 patients received first-line chemotherapy (SOX + Bmab). Second-line therapy (IRIS + Cmab, IRIS + Bmab, or IRIS) was administered to 20 patients (20%). Among the 20 patients, 12 patients received IRIS + Cmab and 8 patients received IRIS + Bmab. |
||||||
| Adverse events | The main grade 3,4 adverse events were sensory neuropathy (18%), fatigue (10%), and anorexia (8%). There were no treatment-related deaths among patients administered the first-line and second-line regimens. |
||||||
| Outcome measures | The primary end-point of this study was the second progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the period from the date of enrollment to the date of either disease progression or death from any cause after second-line chemotherapy whichever came first. Secondary end-points were overall survival (OS), response rate (RR) after first- and second-line chemotherapy, the R0 resection rate (R0-rate), and adverse events. |
||||||
| Plan to share IPD | |||||||
| IPD sharing Plan description | |||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Completed | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Date of IRB |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry |
|
||||||
| Date trial data considered complete |
|
||||||
| Date analysis concluded |
|
||||||
| Other | |
| Other related information | |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/icdr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000004820 |