Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000003832 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000004620 |
Scientific Title | A randomized controlled trial about the effectiveness of prism adaptation therapy on patients with unilateral spatial neglect. |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2010/06/28 |
Last modified on | 2010/06/28 14:58:33 |
A randomized controlled trial about the effectiveness of prism adaptation therapy on patients with unilateral spatial neglect.
The effectiveness of prism adaptation therapy on unilateral spatial neglect
A randomized controlled trial about the effectiveness of prism adaptation therapy on patients with unilateral spatial neglect.
The effectiveness of prism adaptation therapy on unilateral spatial neglect
Japan |
Patients with left unilateral spatial neglect caused by cerebral stroke
Cardiology | Neurology | Rehabilitation medicine |
Others
NO
Unilateral spatial neglect (USN) is defined as a failure to report, respond, or orient to novel or meaningful stimuli, presented to the side opposite to the brain lesion. The most important clinical problem of USN is that it can interfere with the rehabilitation processes and cause poor functional outcome. Various rehabilitation techniques are explored for USN.
Rossetti and collegues reported, for the first time, that short term adaptation for rightward optical shift induced with prismatic lenses improved performance on various standard tests of left USN. Long-term effects (as long as 5 weeks) were also reported following an intensive twice-daily adaptation program for 2 weeks. However, there has been no randomized controlled trial (RCT) with sufficient sample size examining the effects of PA, and few studies are available demonstrating improvement not only in neuropsychological examinations but also in activities of daily living (ADL) with PA.
If greater efficacy of rehabilitation can be brought about by intervening USN early in the rehabilitation process, patients with USN might achieve higher ADL goals.
The purpose of this RCT is to test if PA improves functional outcomes for stroke patients with USN in the subacute stage.
Efficacy
Confirmatory
Pragmatic
Phase III
Behavioral inattention test (BIT), Catherine Bergego scale (CBS)
Time of assessment:at admission, just after intervention, at discharge
Motor score of stroke impairment assessment set (SIAS), Functional independence measure (FIM)
Time of assessment:at admission, just after intervention, at discharge
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Double blind -all involved are blinded
Placebo
YES
YES
Institution is considered as adjustment factor in dynamic allocation.
NO
Numbered container method
2
Treatment
Device,equipment | Maneuver |
Patients were seated at a desk on which a wooden table (height 30 cm) was placed. The top of the table had a semicircular shape with a radius of 30 cm, and three targets were marked at the center, right and left corners of its edge. Patients were asked to point to the three targets through the bottom of the table with their index finger according to the instruction of the therapists who directed three points randomly to the patients. First, they repeated the pointing task thirty times without prism glasses. Then they wore prism glasses which sifted their visual field 12 degrees to the right, and repeated pointing ninety times. After the prism adaptation, they took the prism glasses off and repeated pointing sixty times. Patients underwent two daily training sessions which took about 20 minutes for each, 5 days a week for 2 weeks, giving a total of 20 sessions.
The interventions occurred during their regularly scheduled rehabilitation sessions and all other routine interdisciplinary stroke rehabilitation was provided as usual.
Patients of the control group underwent the same training sessions with neutral plastic glasses instead of the prisms glasses.
The interventions occurred during their regularly scheduled rehabilitation sessions and all other routine interdisciplinary stroke rehabilitation was provided as usual.
41 | years-old | <= |
89 | years-old | >= |
Male and Female
(1) first ever hemiparetic stroke,
(2) admission within 3 months after the stroke onset,
(3) right hemisphere damage
(4)no severe cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination: MMSE>15
(5) at least one item scoring less than the cut off value in the standard test of the Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT).
(1)unable to sit on a wheelchair
(2)unable to understand the task because of aphasia or other cognitive impairment, (3) unable to understand Japanese
(4) extremely decreased eyesight
(5) severe hearing loss
(6) unable to reach with the right upper extremity because of restricted range of motion
(7) right upper extremity amputation more proximal to half of the forearm
(8) severe position sense deficits of the right fingers because of peripheral neuropathy, etc.
(9) past medical history of head trauma or ventriculoperitoneal shunt
(10) patients' refusal for participation.
50
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Katsuhiro Mizuno |
Keio University School of Medicine
Departnment of Rehabilitation Medicine
35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo
03-5363-3833
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Katsuhiro Mizuno |
Keio University School of Medicine
Departnment of Rehabilitation Medicine
35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo
03-5363-3833
mizuno.katsuhiro@gmail.com
Keio University School of Medicine
Tokyo Metropolitan Rehabilitation Hospital
Non profit foundation
JAPAN
NO
東京都リハビリテーション病院(東京都)、市川市リハビリテーション病院(千葉県)、慶應義塾大学月が瀬リハビリテーションセンター(静岡県)、輝山会記念病院(長野県)、国立病院機構村山医療センター(東京都)、辻村病院(愛知県)、稲城市立病院(東京都)、旭川リハビリテーション病院(北海道)
2010 | Year | 06 | Month | 28 | Day |
Unpublished
Completed
2005 | Year | 04 | Month | 28 | Day |
2005 | Year | 08 | Month | 01 | Day |
2007 | Year | 07 | Month | 01 | Day |
2008 | Year | 01 | Month | 01 | Day |
2008 | Year | 03 | Month | 01 | Day |
2009 | Year | 03 | Month | 01 | Day |
2010 | Year | 06 | Month | 28 | Day |
2010 | Year | 06 | Month | 28 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000004620