| Recruitment status | Completed |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000003452 |
| Receipt No. | R000004155 |
| Scientific Title | Randomized contorol trial of transarterial chemoinfusion with cisplatin-lipiodol susupension or miriplatin-lipiodol suspension for advanced HCC |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2010/05/01 |
| Last modified on | 2021/10/13 (Ver. 10) |
| Basic information | ||
| Public title | Randomized contorol trial of transarterial chemoinfusion with cisplatin-lipiodol susupension or miriplatin-lipiodol suspension for advanced HCC | |
| Acronym | Randomized contorol trial of transarterial chemoinfusion for advanced HCC | |
| Scientific Title | Randomized contorol trial of transarterial chemoinfusion with cisplatin-lipiodol susupension or miriplatin-lipiodol suspension for advanced HCC | |
| Scientific Title:Acronym | Randomized contorol trial of transarterial chemoinfusion for advanced HCC | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | |||
| Condition | Hepatocellular carcinoma | ||
| Classification by specialty |
|
||
| Classification by malignancy | Malignancy | ||
| Genomic information | NO | ||
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | To compare with the efficacy and safety on trasarterial chemoinfusion between miriplatin-lipiodol suspension and cisplatin-lipiodol suspension with advanced HCC |
| Basic objectives2 | Safety,Efficacy |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | |
| Trial characteristics_2 | |
| Developmental phase | |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | Response rate |
| Key secondary outcomes | Overall survival
Safety |
| Base | |
| Study type | Interventional |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | Parallel |
| Randomization | Randomized |
| Randomization unit | Individual |
| Blinding | Single blind -participants are blinded |
| Control | Active |
| Stratification | NO |
| Dynamic allocation | NO |
| Institution consideration | Institution is not considered as adjustment factor. |
| Blocking | NO |
| Concealment | Numbered container method |
| Intervention | ||
| No. of arms | 2 | |
| Purpose of intervention | Treatment | |
| Type of intervention |
|
|
| Interventions/Control_1 | Miriplatin-lipiodol suspension group:Powdered miriplatin(70mg) suspended in lipiodol(6ml) is injected through the catheter selectively introduced into the hepatic artery,The doses of suspension are determined according to filled a tumor artery.and upper limitation is 140mg as miriplatin.
If the patients need repeated therapy ,they are treated at the interval of 4weeks |
|
| Interventions/Control_2 | Cisplatin-lipiodol suspension group:Powdered cisplatin(50mg) suspended in lipiodol(6ml) is injected through the catheter selectively introduced into the hepatic artery,The doses of suspension are determined according to filled a tumor artery.and upper limitation is 100mg as cisplatin.
If the patients need repeated therapy ,they are treated at the interval of 4weeks |
|
| Interventions/Control_3 | ||
| Interventions/Control_4 | ||
| Interventions/Control_5 | ||
| Interventions/Control_6 | ||
| Interventions/Control_7 | ||
| Interventions/Control_8 | ||
| Interventions/Control_9 | ||
| Interventions/Control_10 | ||
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male and Female | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | 1)Histologically or clinically comfirmed Hepatocellular carcinoma
2)Patients diagnosed as stage2-3 3)Interval of 4 weeks or over between last treatment and present therapy 4)Child-pugh is A or B 5)No indication for surgical resection or local ablation 6)PS is 0,1 or 2 7)Sufficient functions of main organ(bone marrow,kidney,heart)and conditions filled a following criteria 1 WBC>=2,000 /mm3,<=10,000 /mm3 2 Plt>=50,000 /mm3 3 Hb>=8.0 g/dL 4 T-Bil<=3.0 mg/dL 5 PT>=50% 6 Creatinine<=1.5 mg/dL 7 BUN<=35 mg/dL 8)Age is more than 20 years old and below 80 years old 9)Patients obtained written infoemed consent |
|||
| Key exclusion criteria | 1)Patienta with sever co-morbidity such as cardiac failure or renal failure
2)Patienta with a medical history of severe hypersensitivity 3)Patients who are pregnant,lactating or are suspected to be a pregnant 4)Patients who are concluded to be inappropriate to participate in this study by their physitians |
|||
| Target sample size | 100 | |||
| Research contact person | |||||||
| Name of lead principal investigator |
|
||||||
| Organization | Gifu University Hospital | ||||||
| Division name | First Department of Internal Medicine | ||||||
| Zip code | 501-1194 | ||||||
| Address | 1-1 Yanagido Gifu 501-1194 | ||||||
| TEL | 058-230-6000 | ||||||
| koz@gifu-u.ac.jp | |||||||
| Public contact | |||||||
| Name of contact person |
|
||||||
| Organization | Gifu University Hospital | ||||||
| Division name | First Department of Internal Medicine | ||||||
| Zip code | 5011194 | ||||||
| Address | yanagido1-1,gifu,gifu | ||||||
| TEL | 058-230-6000 | ||||||
| Homepage URL | |||||||
| koz@gifu-u.ac.jp | |||||||
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | First Department of Internal Medicine,Gifu University Hospital |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | First Department of Internal Medicine,Gifu University Hospital |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Self funding |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | |
| IRB Contact (For public release) | |
| Organization | IRB Gifu medical university |
| Address | 1-1 Yanagido Gifu 501-1194 |
| Tel | 058-230-6000 |
| gjme00004@jim.gifu-u.ac.jp | |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | 岐阜市民病院(岐阜県) 岐阜県総合医療センター(岐阜県) 中濃厚生病院(岐阜県) |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | 2015 May;45(5):514-22. doi: 10.1111/hepr.12376. Epub 2014 Jul 24. |
| Publication of results | Published |
| Result | |||||||
| URL related to results and publications | 2015 May;45(5):514-22. doi: 10.1111/hepr.12376. Epub 2014 Jul 24. | ||||||
| Number of participants that the trial has enrolled | 98 | ||||||
| Results | The 1-year survival rates in the cisplatin and miriplatin groups were 84.0% and 77.7%, and the 2-year survival rates were 60.0% and 51.8% respectively. (P = 0.905).The 1-year survival rates in the cisplatin and miriplatin groups with TAI alone were 71.4% and 71.4%, and the 2-year survival rates cannot be calculated yet. (P = 0.695).TE evaluation, the 1-year survival rates in TE3+4 and TE1+2 groups were 100% and 62.1%, and the 2-year survival rates were 66.7% and 33.1% respectively. (P = 0.0263).
|
||||||
| Results date posted |
|
||||||
| Results Delayed | |||||||
| Results Delay Reason | |||||||
| Date of the first journal publication of results | |||||||
| Baseline Characteristics | diagnosis of HCC by histology or contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) | ||||||
| Participant flow | After admission, patients were randomly assigned to either the cisplatin or miriplatin group before undergoing angiography. Balanced randomization was carried out by employing index factors of etiology, sex, age, primary or recurrent disease, TACE or TAI, and previous therapy. | ||||||
| Adverse events | Incidences of any adverse event were 67.3% (33/49) in the cisplatin group and 63.3% (31/49) in the miriplatin group (P=0.6712, Table 5). No major complications of grade 4 or higher occurred in either group. Grade 3 nausea occurred in 1 patient in the cisplatin group. Anaphylaxis occurred in 1 patient in each group, both during the second session. Both cases fulfilled all major criteria of the definition by Ruggeberg JU, et al 18 for the diagnosis of anaphylactic shock. The amount of drug at the first session was 100 mg of cisplatin and 75 mg of miriplatin. Each patient continued TACE with another agent. Diphasic fever appeared in 1 patient in the cisplatin group and in 5 patients in the miriplatin group (P=0.079). No other differences were found between the groups for each effect (Table 5). | ||||||
| Outcome measures | The primary endpoint was the TE 3 months after initial TACE or TAI, and the secondary endpoint was overall survival. | ||||||
| Plan to share IPD | |||||||
| IPD sharing Plan description | |||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Completed | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Date of IRB |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry | |||||||
| Date trial data considered complete | |||||||
| Date analysis concluded | |||||||
| Other | |
| Other related information | |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/icdr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000004155 |