Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000002631 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000003205 |
Scientific Title | Prospective, randomized, open-label, clinical trial comparing the effects of olmesartan and amlodipine on blood pressure, endothelial function and makers for obesity/oxidative stress/chronic kidney diseases |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2009/10/16 |
Last modified on | 2011/12/01 13:30:19 |
Prospective, randomized, open-label, clinical trial comparing the effects of olmesartan and amlodipine on blood pressure, endothelial function and makers for obesity/oxidative stress/chronic kidney diseases
Prospective, randomized, open-label, clinical trial comparing the effects of olmesartan and amlodipine
Prospective, randomized, open-label, clinical trial comparing the effects of olmesartan and amlodipine on blood pressure, endothelial function and makers for obesity/oxidative stress/chronic kidney diseases
Prospective, randomized, open-label, clinical trial comparing the effects of olmesartan and amlodipine
Japan |
Hypertension
Cardiology |
Others
NO
Comparison of olmesartan versus amlodipine on blood pressure, endothelial function and levels of markers for inflammation/obesity/oxidative stress/early stage kidney diseases.
Efficacy
Blood pressure (On visit/Home monitoring)
Flow-mediated vasodilation in forearm
Heparin-releasable EC-SOD levels
Twelve weeks after administration
Markers indicating obesity (e.g. adiponectin), inflammation (high sensitive CRP), oxidative stress (8-OHdG/ MDA-LDL), early-staged kidney diseases (microalbuminuria)
Twelve weeks after administration
Interventional
Cross-over
Randomized
Open -but assessor(s) are blinded
Active
2
Treatment
Medicine |
Administration of olmesartan
Administration of amlodipine
20 | years-old | <= |
75 | years-old | >= |
Male and Female
1) Hypertensive patients recommended for administration of antihypertensive agents in Hypertension Guidelines issued by Japanese Association of Hypertension
2) Outpatients
3) Subjects who gave written informed consent
1) Allergy against olmesartan/amlodipine
2) Poor-controlled hypertension (DBP>110 mmHg)
3) Poor-controlled diabetes (HbA1c>8.0 %)
4) Secondary hypertension
5) History of stroke, acute coronary syndrome or any cardiovascular diseases needed for inpatient-treatments within 6 months
6) Either level of aspartate aminotransaminase or alanine aminotransferase exceed three-fold of the normal limits.
7) End stage renal disease
8) Symptomatic (NYHA III or IV) congestive heart failure
9) Malignancies or other diseases with poor prognosis
10) Pregnant
11) Subjects whose doctor in charge do not agree to join the trial
30
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Katsunori Ikewaki |
National Defense Medical College
Department of Internal Medicine
3-2 Namiki, Tokorozawa Japan 359-8513
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Makoto Ayaori |
National Defense Medical College
Department of Internal Medicine
ayaori@ndmc.ac.jp
National Defense Medical College
Foundation for Promotion of Defense Medicine
Non profit foundation
NO
2009 | Year | 10 | Month | 16 | Day |
Published
http://www.nature.com/hr/journal/v34/n6/full/hr201111a.html
Endothelial dysfunction in essential hypertension is an independent predictor for future cardiovascular events. Although inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) reportedly improves endothelial function through its effects on oxidative stress and inflammation, questions remain regarding which factors are pivotal for improvement of endothelial function by RAS inhibition. We therefore performed a prospective, randomized crossover trial in which an angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist (ARB), olmesartan, and calcium channel blocker (CCB), amlodipine, were compared in 31 essential hypertensive patients. Results showed that, although both treatments achieved comparable lowering of blood pressure (BP), olmesartan, but not amlodipine, significantly improved endothelial function as evaluated by flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) in the brachial artery. Although no significant changes in diabetic and lipid parameters were observed with either drug, olmesartan slightly decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate which, surprisingly, translated into decreased microalbuminuria. In a similar vein, olmesartan reduced serum C-reactive protein and increased urine antioxidant levels compared to baseline, and reduced urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha levels compared to both baseline and amlodipine. Finally, although overall changes in plasma extracellular superoxide dismutase (EC-SOD) levels were not modulated by either treatment, for olmesartan there was a positive correlation between changes in FMD and those in EC-SOD levels.
In conclusion, olmesartan improved endothelial function in hypertensive patients independent of its BP-lowering effect, which was due, at least in part, to its antioxidative property. Therefore, olmesartan might provide a greater long term benefit for hypertensive patients with impaired endothelial function than amlodipine.
Completed
2009 | Year | 10 | Month | 15 | Day |
2009 | Year | 10 | Month | 01 | Day |
2011 | Year | 06 | Month | 01 | Day |
2011 | Year | 07 | Month | 01 | Day |
2011 | Year | 07 | Month | 01 | Day |
2011 | Year | 08 | Month | 01 | Day |
2009 | Year | 10 | Month | 15 | Day |
2011 | Year | 12 | Month | 01 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000003205