| Recruitment status | Completed |
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000000577 |
| Receipt No. | R000000691 |
| Official scientific title of the study | A three-way crossover clinical pharmacological study to evaluate a drug interaction on P-gp at Blood Brain Barrier between histamine H1 receptor antagonist Ebastine and P-gp inhibitor Verapamil by using saccadic eye movement analyzing system and visual analogue scale (VAS) in healthy Japanese male volunteers |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2007/02/01 |
| Last modified on | 2016/04/09 (Ver. 6) |
| Basic information | ||
| Official scientific title of the study | A three-way crossover clinical pharmacological study to evaluate a drug interaction on P-gp at Blood Brain Barrier between histamine H1 receptor antagonist Ebastine and P-gp inhibitor Verapamil by using saccadic eye movement analyzing system and visual analogue scale (VAS) in healthy Japanese male volunteers | |
| Title of the study (Brief title) | Clinical pharmacological study to evaluate a drug interaction on P-gp at Blood Brain Barrier between histamine H1 receptor antagonist Ebastine and P-gp inhibitor Verapamil | |
| Region |
|
|
| Condition | ||
| Condition | healthy Japanese male volunteers | |
| Classification by specialty |
|
|
| Classification by malignancy | Others | |
| Genomic information | NO | |
| Objectives | |
| Narrative objectives1 | The aim of this study is to evaluate a drug interaction on P-gp at Blood Brain Barrie in healthy Japanese male volunteers. A three-way crossover with more than a 6-day washout period between study sessions is planed. Three study medication group are as follows; E10 group: oral single dose of Ebastin, histamine H1 receptor antagonist, 10 mg, E20 group: oral single dose of Ebastin 20 mg and EV group: oral single dose of Ebastin 10 mg and oral single dose of Verapamil, P-gp inhibitor, at 3 hours after Ebastin dosing. Sedative side effect of Ebastin is measured with both saccadic eye movement analysis as a subjective evaluation and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) as an objective evaluation. And PK/PD analysis is also performed. |
| Basic objectives2 | PK,PD |
| Basic objectives -Others | |
| Trial characteristics_1 | Exploratory |
| Trial characteristics_2 | Explanatory |
| Developmental phase | Not applicable |
| Assessment | |
| Primary outcomes | Saccadic eye movement peak velocity |
| Key secondary outcomes | Other saccadic eve movement parameters (latency)
Visual analogue scale alertness score Plasma concentration of Carabastine |
| In outcomes field, the entry of just a few words such as "safety" or "efficiency" will not be accepted. Specify the name of outcome measures, including the time when you plan to measure. Usually, only one primary outcome is accepted. Write the other outcomes in "secondary outcomes" field. |
| Base | |
| Study type | Interventional |
| Study design | |
| Basic design | Cross-over |
| Randomization | Randomized |
| Randomization unit | Individual |
| Blinding | Open -no one is blinded |
| Control | Active |
| Stratification | NO |
| Dynamic allocation | NO |
| Institution consideration | Institution is not considered as adjustment factor. |
| Blocking | YES |
| Concealment | No need to know |
| Intervention | ||
| No. of arms | 3 | |
| Purpose of intervention | Treatment | |
| Type of intervention |
|
|
| Interventions/Control_1 | Ebastin 10 mg single oral dose | |
| Interventions/Control_2 | Ebastin 20 mg single oral dose | |
| Interventions/Control_3 | Ebastin 10 mg single oral dose +Verapamil 80 mg single oral dose | |
| Interventions/Control_4 | ||
| Interventions/Control_5 | ||
| Interventions/Control_6 | ||
| Interventions/Control_7 | ||
| Interventions/Control_8 | ||
| Interventions/Control_9 | ||
| Interventions/Control_10 | ||
| In interventions field, include the details of interventions, such as duration, amount, and frequency. If the intervention includes prescription or use of medical devices, duration is required. |
| Eligibility | ||||
| Age-lower limit |
|
|||
| Age-upper limit |
|
|||
| Gender | Male | |||
| Key inclusion criteria | 1.Healthy Japanese male volunteer
2.Age from 20<= <40 3.Subjects who can report self condition 4.Without clinically significant abnormalities in a series of screening examination 5.Written informed consent |
|||
| Key exclusion criteria | 1.Any clinically significant history of drug abuse, alcoholic abuse, heart, liver, kidney, lung, and blood disease etc. thought to be not eligible to participate in the study
2.Subjects known to treated with medicine which has a sedative effect or an antihistaminic agents 3.Subjects who can not abstaine from smoking during study period 4. Subjects who have the 1st deg. AV block on their ECG examination at screening visit. 5. Subjects who have any clinically significant abnormalities on their ECG examination at screening visit. 6.Any drug allergy history 7.Subjects who is using excessive alcohol regularly (cannot keep abstinence for study period) 8.Perticipation in any clinical trial within 4 months 9.Donation of more than 200mL blood within 3 months 10.Any use of drugs in the 2 weeks prior to study drug administration 11.Subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator, are not likely to participate in the study for any reason |
|||
| Target sample size | 8 | |||
| Research contact person | |
| Name of lead principal investigator | Naoki UCHIDA MD.,PhD |
| Organization | Showa University School of Medicine |
| Division name | Second department of Pharmacology |
| Address | 1-5-8 Hatanodai Shinagawa-ku Tokyo 142-8555 |
| TEL | 03-3784-8128 |
| nuchida@med.showa-u.ac.jp | |
| Public contact | |
| Name of contact person | Naoki UCHIDA MD.,PhD |
| Organization | Showa University School of Medicine |
| Division name | Second department of Pharmacology |
| Address | 1-5-8 Hatanodai Shinagawa-ku Tokyo 142-8555 |
| TEL | 03-3784-8128 |
| Homepage URL | |
| nuchida@med.showa-u.ac.jp | |
| Sponsor | |
| Institute | Showa University School of Medicine Second department of Pharmacology |
| Institute | |
| Department | |
| Sponsor means an organization that is responsible for plan, deployment and report of the research including funding management. It doesn't mean funding agency". Therefore, all clinical trial should have the one. |
| Funding Source | |
| Organization | The Special Subsidies in Subsidies for ordinary expenses of private schools from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in 2006. |
| Organization | |
| Division | |
| Category of Funding Organization | Japanese Governmental office |
| Nationality of Funding Organization | Japan |
| Other related organizations | |
| Co-sponsor | Yakusen-kai Kannondai Clinic |
| Name of secondary funder(s) | Not applicable |
| Secondary IDs | |
| Secondary IDs | NO |
| Study ID_1 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
| Study ID_2 | |
| Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
| IND to MHLW | |
| Institutions | |
| Institutions | |
| Other administrative information | |||||||
| Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
||||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Recruitment status | Completed | ||||||
| Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
| Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
| Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
| Date of closure to data entry |
|
||||||
| Date trial data considered complete |
|
||||||
| Date analysis concluded |
|
||||||
| Related information | |
| URL releasing protocol | |
| Publication of results | Published |
| URL releasing results | |
| Results | Cmax and AUC of plasma Carebastine, active metabolite of Ebastine, in E20 were about 2-fold higher than those in E10. The amount of increased of Cmax and AUC was proportionateto dose escalation. The pharmacokinetic profiles of plasma carebastine in EV was similar to those in E10, not co-administered P-gp inhibitor verapamil. That suggested verapamil 80 mg did not affect on ebastine and carebastine PK.
No statistically significant change was observed in SPV after dose of ebastine in all E10, E20 and EV groups. And VAS, as a parameter subjective evaluation, was also no significant change in all groups. These results suggested that clinically significant sedative side effect would not occur after dose of the 2nd generation of anti-histamine Ebastine, even though P-gp at BBB was inhibited by verapamil co-administered. Chinese Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology. 21(4) p.335, 2007 Jpn. J Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., 38(Suppl): S244, 2007 |
| Other related information | |
| Management information | |||||||
| Registered date |
|
||||||
| Last modified on |
|
||||||
| Link to view the page | |
| URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000000691 |