UMIN試験ID | UMIN000048111 |
---|---|
受付番号 | R000054833 |
科学的試験名 | Megaprosthetic reconstruction of distal femur with short residual proximal femur following resection of bone tumor: a systematic review |
一般公開日(本登録希望日) | 2022/06/20 |
最終更新日 | 2022/06/20 15:43:20 |
日本語
Megaprosthetic reconstruction of distal femur with short residual proximal femur following resection of bone tumor: a systematic review
英語
Megaprosthetic reconstruction of distal femur with short residual proximal femur following resection of bone tumor: a systematic review
日本語
Megaprosthetic reconstruction of distal femur with short residual proximal femur following resection of bone tumor: a systematic review
英語
Megaprosthetic reconstruction of distal femur with short residual proximal femur following resection of bone tumor: a systematic review
日本語
Megaprosthetic reconstruction of distal femur with short residual proximal femur following resection of bone tumor: a systematic review
英語
Megaprosthetic reconstruction of distal femur with short residual proximal femur following resection of bone tumor: a systematic review
日本語
Megaprosthetic reconstruction of distal femur with short residual proximal femur following resection of bone tumor: a systematic review
英語
Megaprosthetic reconstruction of distal femur with short residual proximal femur following resection of bone tumor: a systematic review
日本/Japan | 欧州/Europe |
日本語
bone tumor
英語
bone tumor
整形外科学/Orthopedics |
悪性腫瘍/Malignancy
いいえ/NO
日本語
To investigate the risk of postoperative function and complications in patients with short residual proximal femur after resection of a distal femoral bone tumor, we performed a systematic review of studies reporting functional results and complications in patients with short residual proximal femur after reconstruction of a distal femoral bone tumor with custom-made megaprosthesis, APC and CPS implant.
英語
To investigate the risk of postoperative function and complications in patients with short residual proximal femur after resection of a distal femoral bone tumor, we performed a systematic review of studies reporting functional results and complications in patients with short residual proximal femur after reconstruction of a distal femoral bone tumor with custom-made megaprosthesis, APC and CPS implant.
安全性・有効性/Safety,Efficacy
日本語
英語
日本語
mechanical survival where the endpoint was set to implant removal for any reason
英語
mechanical survival where the endpoint was set to implant removal for any reason
日本語
英語
その他・メタアナリシス等/Others,meta-analysis etc
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
1 | 歳/years-old | 以上/<= |
99 | 歳/years-old | 以下/>= |
男女両方/Male and Female
日本語
Only studies reporting functional results and complications regarding megaprosthetic reconstruction of distal femur with short residual proximal femur following resection of bone tumor were included.
英語
Only studies reporting functional results and complications regarding megaprosthetic reconstruction of distal femur with short residual proximal femur following resection of bone tumor were included.
日本語
(1) Studies in which reconstruction was performed in patients without short residual proximal femurs were excluded. Studies that performed reconstruction in patients with short residual proximal femurs and did not specify both functional results and complications were also excluded. (2) Only English- and Japanese-language literature was included, with no restriction on the year of publication.
英語
(1) Studies in which reconstruction was performed in patients without short residual proximal femurs were excluded. Studies that performed reconstruction in patients with short residual proximal femurs and did not specify both functional results and complications were also excluded. (2) Only English- and Japanese-language literature was included, with no restriction on the year of publication.
日本語
名 | 真治 |
ミドルネーム | |
姓 | 塚本 |
英語
名 | Shinji |
ミドルネーム | |
姓 | Tsukamoto |
日本語
奈良県立医科大学
英語
Nara medical university
日本語
整形外科
英語
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
634-8521
日本語
840, Shijo-cho, Kashihara-city Nara 634-8521, Japan
英語
840, Shijo-cho, Kashihara-city Nara 634-8521, Japan
0744223051
shinji104@mail.goo.ne.jp
日本語
名 | 真治 |
ミドルネーム | |
姓 | 塚本 |
英語
名 | Shinji |
ミドルネーム | |
姓 | Tsukamoto |
日本語
奈良県立医科大学
英語
Nara Medical University
日本語
整形外科
英語
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
634-8521
日本語
奈良県橿原市四条町840番地
英語
840, Shijo-cho, Kashihara-city Nara 634-8521, Japan
0744223051
shinji104@mail.goo.ne.jp
日本語
奈良県立医科大学
英語
Nara medical university
日本語
奈良県立医科大学
日本語
日本語
英語
日本語
奈良県立医科大学
英語
Nara medical university
日本語
奈良県立医科大学
日本語
地方自治体/Local Government
日本語
日本
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
Nara Medical University
英語
Nara Medical University
日本語
840, Shijo-cho, Kashihara-city, Nara 634-8521, Japan
英語
840, Shijo-cho, Kashihara-city, Nara 634-8521, Japan
0744223051
shinji104@mail.goo.ne.jp
いいえ/NO
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
2022 | 年 | 06 | 月 | 20 | 日 |
未公表/Unpublished
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
開始前/Preinitiation
2022 | 年 | 06 | 月 | 18 | 日 |
2022 | 年 | 06 | 月 | 20 | 日 |
2022 | 年 | 06 | 月 | 30 | 日 |
日本語
Data collection and presentation
Two authors (ST and TM) independently selected the studies and extracted the data. In case of any disagreement, agreement was reached between the two or the third author was consulted. The following data were collected using the data collection sheet. (1) Basic data: author, year of publication, journal name, type of study, number of patients, age of patients, histology of tumor (2) Surgical indication, method of reconstruction, cement fixation, porous coating, time to full weight bearing, stem length of prosthesis, adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant radiotherapy, nonunion, aseptic loosening, implant breakage, fracture, infection, mechanical survival where the endpoint was set to implant removal for any reason, oncological outcome, Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score [19], postoperative follow-up period.
Data summary
Data extracted from the collected study data are summarized in Table 1 and 2. Table 3 summarized the time to full weight bearing, nonunion, aseptic loosening, implant breakage, fracture, infection, mechanical survival, MSTS score [19], and postoperative follow-up period for each reconstruction method (custom-made megaprosthesis, APC, and CPS implant). Because all the studies included in this review were non-randomized, data pooling (meta-analysis) was not appropriate, and thus, not performed.
Assessment of methodological quality
Two authors (ST and TM) independently assessed the quality of the included studies. When there was disagreement, agreement was reached between the two authors or by consulting a third author. Articles included in the final analysis were independently assessed according to the Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomized Studies (RoBANS tool) for assessing the quality of non-randomized studies in meta-studies [20].
英語
Data collection and presentation
Two authors (ST and TM) independently selected the studies and extracted the data. In case of any disagreement, agreement was reached between the two or the third author was consulted. The following data were collected using the data collection sheet. (1) Basic data: author, year of publication, journal name, type of study, number of patients, age of patients, histology of tumor (2) Surgical indication, method of reconstruction, cement fixation, porous coating, time to full weight bearing, stem length of prosthesis, adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant radiotherapy, nonunion, aseptic loosening, implant breakage, fracture, infection, mechanical survival where the endpoint was set to implant removal for any reason, oncological outcome, Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score [19], postoperative follow-up period.
Data summary
Data extracted from the collected study data are summarized in Table 1 and 2. Table 3 summarized the time to full weight bearing, nonunion, aseptic loosening, implant breakage, fracture, infection, mechanical survival, MSTS score [19], and postoperative follow-up period for each reconstruction method (custom-made megaprosthesis, APC, and CPS implant). Because all the studies included in this review were non-randomized, data pooling (meta-analysis) was not appropriate, and thus, not performed.
Assessment of methodological quality
Two authors (ST and TM) independently assessed the quality of the included studies. When there was disagreement, agreement was reached between the two authors or by consulting a third author. Articles included in the final analysis were independently assessed according to the Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomized Studies (RoBANS tool) for assessing the quality of non-randomized studies in meta-studies [20].
2022 | 年 | 06 | 月 | 20 | 日 |
2022 | 年 | 06 | 月 | 20 | 日 |
日本語
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000054833
英語
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000054833
研究計画書 | |
---|---|
登録日時 | ファイル名 |
研究症例データ仕様書 | |
---|---|
登録日時 | ファイル名 |
研究症例データ | |
---|---|
登録日時 | ファイル名 |